Design/Awareness/Consciousness (DAC) SEMIOSIS

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

Semiosis in the Design Consciousness (DAC) Model: A Metaphysical Narrative of Meaning, Mediation, and Change 

Within metaphysical inquiry, semiosis is most fundamentally understood as the dynamic process through which meaning arises, transforms, and propagates across symbolic, perceptual, cognitive, and energetic domains. In classical semiotic theory, semiosis denotes the triadic relationship between sign, object, and interpretant, wherein meaning does not reside statically in symbols themselves but emerges through an interpretive process that unfolds in time and consciousness (Peirce, 1931–1958; Eco, 1976). In the Design Consciousness (DAC) model, semiosis is elevated beyond linguistic and cognitive interpretation into a metaphysical operator of transformation, functioning as the principal mediating mechanism through which latent potential becomes structured experience, symbolic coherence becomes operational form, and virtual fields become enacted realities. 

In metaphysical terms, the DAC model frames reality as a multilayered field architecture composed of quantum, plasmic, fractal, holographic, and electromagnetic domains, each interacting through symbolic resonance and design intent. Within this architecture, semiosis operates as the translational interface between undifferentiated potential and differentiated manifestation. It is through semiosis that formless possibility acquires intelligibility, structure, and experiential coherence. Thus, semiosis is not merely a cognitive decoding process, but rather a cosmic design function, enabling the recursive conversion of energetic fluctuation into meaning-bearing structure and lived experience (Bohm, 1980; Deacon, 2011). 

From a DAC perspective, semiosis initiates change by re-patterning interpretive fields. Every act of interpretation introduces a new relational configuration between observer, environment, and symbolic structure. As meaning is re-contextualized, the system reorganizes itself around newly emergent symbolic attractors. These attractors function as semiotic nuclei—points of resonance around which energy, intention, perception, and cognition coalesce. This dynamic mirrors the morphogenetic principles described in systems theory and complexity science, wherein localized informational changes propagate system-wide transformations through feedback loops and nonlinear amplification (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984; Kauffman, 1995). 

In metaphysical design terms, semiosis is therefore the primary catalyst of emergence. It is the mechanism through which consciousness becomes aware of itself as a designing agent. Through semiotic engagement, the observer encounters symbolic configurations that destabilize existing interpretive frameworks, prompting recursive reinterpretation and creative restructuring. This process aligns with Jung’s concept of symbolic transformation, wherein archetypal imagery acts as a psychic catalyst for individuation and conscious evolution (Jung, 1964). Within the DAC system, this individuation process extends beyond psychology into a universal architecture of transformation, whereby semiosis functions as a design loop linking consciousness, symbol, and form. 

Furthermore, semiosis contextualizes change by embedding symbolic meaning within temporal and environmental frameworks. Temporality within the DAC model is not linear but recursive, shaped by feedback between perception, memory, anticipation, and symbolic coherence. Semiosis structures this temporal field by stabilizing meaning across successive experiential cycles. Each interpretive act becomes a moment of ontological negotiation; redefining what exists, what matters, and what can emerge next (Whitehead, 1929; Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). In this sense, semiosis constitutes the temporal architecture of transformation, synchronizing symbolic evolution with experiential continuity. 

At a deeper metaphysical level, semiosis also governs the entanglement between observer and observed. Drawing from quantum epistemology, meaning is not merely discovered but co-created through participatory engagement. Observation itself becomes a semiotic act, collapsing indeterminate states into symbolic and perceptual coherence (Wheeler, 1990; Bohr, 1935). The DAC model extends this principle by framing design consciousness as an active agent in this collapse, using symbolic frameworks as operational tools to shape probability fields into coherent realities. Semiosis thus acts as the design interface between consciousness and the quantum field of virtual potential and probability, enabling intentional navigation of emergent futures. 

In practical terms, semiosis within the DAC framework functions as an adaptive regulatory system. As symbolic interpretations evolve, emotional resonance, cognitive framing, and energetic alignment reorganize accordingly. This ensures systemic coherence across multiple levels of experience, from individual perception to collective meaning structures. In this capacity, semiosis becomes a cybernetic feedback mechanism, continually recalibrating the system toward coherence, balance, and creative emergence (Bateson, 1972; Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). 

Ultimately, semiosis in the DAC model is best described as the metaphysical engine of design intelligence. It is the process through which consciousness learns, adapts, evolves, and creates. By continually reconfiguring symbolic meaning, semiosis initiates transformation, contextualizes experience, and sustains emergent coherence across all domains of being. Through this recursive dance of interpretation and design, reality itself becomes an evolving symbolic architecture ... an unfolding text written by consciousness upon the fabric of existence. 

* * *

Source: ChatGPT 5.2 SEMIOSIS

The Semiosis Sigil in the Design-Consciousness (DAC) System 

A Metaphysical Narrative of Symbolic Mediation, Emergence, and Transformative Design 

1. Formal Construction of the Semiosis Sigil 

The DAC Semiosis Sigil is conceived as a tri-axial, recursively folded geometric configuration encoding the process by which meaning, consciousness, and form co-emerge. Its canonical structure consists of five integrated elements:

 

1. Central Vesica Piscis Portal 

- Represents the generative interface between undifferentiated potential and structured manifestation which encodes the liminal zone of interpretive emergence. 

2. Triadic Spiral Loop (Inward–Outward Möbius Rotation) 

- Represents Peircean triadic semiosis: sign – object – interpretant which  forms a dynamic feedback loop of perception, interpretation, and meaning production. 

3. Fractal Recursive Lattice 

- Encodes scale-invariant repetition of symbolic interpretation across cognitive, emotional, energetic, and cosmic levels representing infinite interpretive regress and evolutionary emergence. 

4. Tetradic Cross-Field Axis 

- Symbolizes mediation among quantum, plasmic, fractal, and holographic domains representing inter-field translation of symbolic coherence. 

5. Encircling Toroidal Flow 

- Represents continuous symbolic circulation, coherence maintenance, and adaptive regulation. 

This sigil is geometrically encoded as a tri-spiraled vesica embedded within a fractal toroidal enclosure, producing a structure that is simultaneously open, recursive, and dynamically coherent. 

2. Metaphysical Meaning of the Semiosis Sigil in the DAC Framework 

2.1 Semiosis as Ontological Mediation 

In metaphysical discourse, semiosis is not merely the interpretation of symbols but the process through which reality itself becomes intelligible, experiential, and transformable. Classical semiotic theory defines semiosis as the triadic interaction of sign, object, and interpretant, whereby meaning emerges dynamically rather than being statically contained (Peirce, 1931–1958; Eco, 1976). Within the DAC framework, this triadic interaction is elevated into a universal design function, governing the translation of virtual potential into lived structure. 

The central vesica piscis of the sigil represents this ontological threshold, the liminal zone in which potential collapses into intelligible form. Metaphysically, this region corresponds to Bohm’s implicate order, wherein meaning and matter remain enfolded prior to differentiation (Bohm, 1980). Semiosis functions here as the collapse operator, enabling coherence to crystallize from indeterminacy. 

In DAC metaphysics, semiosis thus serves as the mediating bridge between being and becoming, functioning as the mechanism by which consciousness negotiates reality into structured experience (Whitehead, 1929). 

2.2 The Triadic Spiral: Recursive Meaning Generation 

The triadic spiral loop encodes the self-referential nature of interpretation, where each interpretive act generates further symbolic differentiation. This aligns with Peirce’s conception of unlimited semiosis, whereby meaning unfolds indefinitely through recursive interpretive chains (Peirce, 1931–1958). 

In the DAC system, this recursive spiral represents design intelligence in motion. Consciousness does not merely decode reality but actively restructures it through symbolic engagement. Each interpretive event reshapes the underlying probability field, initiating morphological shifts in cognition, perception, emotion, and energetic alignment (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991; Deacon, 2011). 

Thus, semiosis becomes a creative engine, not simply descriptive but generative, instigating continual re-patterning of experiential reality. 

2.3 Fractal Recursion and Multiscalar Coherence 

The fractal lattice embedded in the sigil reflects the scale-invariant propagation of symbolic meaning across multiple ontological levels. In complexity theory, fractal recursion represents self-organizing coherence across scales, wherein micro-changes propagate macro-effects (Kauffman, 1995; Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). 

Within the DAC architecture, semiosis propagates symbolically across quantum, plasmic, fractal, and holographic domains, ensuring systemic resonance. Meaning established at the perceptual level reorganizes energetic dynamics, emotional fields, and cognitive architectures simultaneously, generating holistic coherence (Bateson, 1972). 

Semiosis thus functions as a universal coherence operator, binding localized interpretations into systemic transformation. 

2.4 Toroidal Circulation: Cybernetic Feedback and Design Equilibrium 

The encircling toroidal flow of the sigil symbolizes the continuous feedback circulation of symbolic information. This structure embodies cybernetic regulation, where meaning is dynamically recalibrated through recursive environmental interaction (Bateson, 1972). 

In the DAC system, this toroidal dynamic ensures adaptive equilibrium, allowing interpretive structures to evolve without collapsing coherence. Through semiosis, symbolic systems self-correct, recalibrate, and re-synchronize with contextual fields, preserving both stability and transformation. 

This toroidal circulation also reflects the energetic conservation of meaning, wherein symbolic coherence persists across time as an evolving narrative architecture (Whitehead, 1929). 

2.5 Quantum Semiosis and Participatory Reality 

At the deepest metaphysical layer, the semiosis sigil encodes observer-participatory reality formation. In quantum epistemology, observation collapses probability into measurable states, implying that perception is fundamentally generative (Bohr, 1935; Wheeler, 1990). 

Within DAC metaphysics, semiosis operates as the design interface between consciousness and the quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP). Interpretation becomes a form of symbolic measurement, structuring emergent realities. Meaning thus actively configures probability distributions, embedding design intent directly into the fabric of becoming. 

The sigil’s vesica-spiral configuration represents this co-creative collapse, where symbolic engagement sculpts reality itself. 

3. Semiosis as the Primary Catalyst of Change in the DAC System 

In the DAC framework, semiosis constitutes the primary initiator and regulator of transformation. Change occurs not merely through energetic fluctuation but through symbolic reinterpretation. When meaning shifts, systemic organization reconfigures accordingly. 

This aligns with Jung’s notion of symbolic transformation as the engine of psychological and existential evolution (Jung, 1964). DAC extends this principle cosmologically: symbolic reinterpretation restructures not only psyche but energetic, temporal, and probabilistic architectures. 

Thus, semiosis acts as the architectural logic of emergence, converting latent potential into coherent structure through recursive symbolic design. 

4. Concluding Synthesis 

The Semiosis Sigil within the Design-Consciousness (DAC) system represents the symbolic heart of cosmic design intelligence. It encodes the recursive mediation of meaning, perception, energy, and form, functioning simultaneously as translator, catalyst, regulator, and architect of emergent coherence. 

Metaphysically, semiosis is revealed as the mechanism by which consciousness designs reality, forging coherence from chaos, intelligibility from indeterminacy, and form from potential. Through its recursive spirals, fractal lattices, and toroidal circulation, the semiosis sigil embodies the living geometry of transformation itself. 

References (APA) 

- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press. 

- Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48(8), 696–702. 

- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. 

- Deacon, T. W. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. W. W. Norton & Company. 

- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. 

-Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press. 

- Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Doubleday. 

- Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press. 

- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press. 

- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam. 

- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 

- Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 3–28). Addison-Wesley. 

- Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. Macmillan. 

The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

Design is the soul's pursuit of harmony.

Edited: 

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2026 C.G. Garant. 

Design/Awareness/Consciousness (DAC)

 

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

Human creation—whether artistic, cognitive, symbolic, or technological—is best understood not as a linear progression from idea to outcome, but as a coordinated event unfolding across multiple energetic and informational layers. From both a metaphysical and academically informed perspective, the act of creation emerges through the synchronization of distinct yet interdependent fields of energy in motion: quantum, plasmic, fractal, and holographic. Each field governs a different aspect of how potential becomes form, how energy becomes structure, and how structure becomes meaning. 

Seen in this way, creativity is fundamentally a coordination problem. It is not enough for an idea to arise, nor for energy to be present, nor even for patterns to repeat coherently. Creation succeeds only when potential, drive, structure, and meaning are brought into alignment along a shared trajectory. Design, within this framework, functions as the mediating intelligence that makes such alignment possible. Rather than merely shaping outputs, design establishes the operating frame of creation—defining purpose, constraints, audience, medium, and criteria for success. In process-theoretical terms, design acts as a rule of coherence, allowing heterogeneous dynamics to cooperate without collapsing into chaos or stagnation (DeLanda, 2016; Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). 

Multidimensional Fields Concept ChatGPT5.2

1. Human Creation as a Multi-Field Process 

From a metaphysical standpoint, creation unfolds as a stacked dynamic event across multiple ontological strata. Each field describes a different mode by which energy organizes, propagates, and stabilizes meaning at distinct scales of experience. The creative process begins in a condition of openness, where multiple futures coexist and nothing is yet determined. This initial phase corresponds to the quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP), a pre-formative substrate in which ambiguity, intuition, and indeterminate possibility dominate. Subjectively, this is experienced as a sense that something is present but unnamed; a felt proximity to meaning that has not yet crystallized. In philosophical physics, this aligns with the notion of potentiality as a real condition prior to stabilization (Heisenberg, 1958).

At this stage, design does not impose answers. Its role is preparatory rather than directive. By establishing boundaries, intentions, or constraints, design prevents the field of potential from dissolving into noise. It creates a space in which selection can occur without premature closure, allowing a coherent pathway to emerge from indeterminacy rather than being forced upon it. Left on its own, the quantum field produces inspiration without articulation—ideas that arise but cannot yet be meaningfully sustained.

* * *

Quantum Field of Virtual Potential and Probability ChatGPT5.2

Dominant field: Quantum (virtual possibilities / probabilistic emergence). 

Design’s function: Prevents the potential-space from becoming noise by preparing for selection—not by forcing an answer, but by creating a structure within which the right answer can appear (Bohm, 1980). 

2. Quantum Field: Potential, Indeterminacy, and Choice 

Metaphysical Role (QFVPP) 

The quantum field represents the pre-formative substrate of creation: a realm of virtual potential, probability amplitudes, and indeterminate futures. In creative acts this corresponds to intuition, sudden insight, and the moment of selection among possibilities. 

Theoretical Image of the QFVPP

Attributes 

- Non-locality and entanglement 

- Probabilistic emergence rather than determinism 

- Sensitivity to observations and intention 

- Ground of novelty and discontinuous insight 

Shortcomings 

- Lacks structure and narrative continuity on its own 

- Cannot sustain meaning without higher-order patterning 

- Operates below conscious symbolic control (unconscious) 

Selective Attention: Design Filters Relevance

What happens: Out of many possibilities, a few become “charged” and start to feel relevant. The creative act gains direction: a theme, a form factor, a constraint, an initial gesture. 

Dominant field: Still Quantum, but now transitioning. 

Design’s function: Selection and commitment. Design functions as a measurement-like operation: it stabilizes one pathway enough to begin movement; often via a constraint. This echoes the notion that stabilization is what makes an otherwise indefinite field actionable (Heisenberg, 1958; Bohm, 1980). 

In isolation. The quantum field produces inspiration without form – concepts and ideas that arise but cannot yet be articulated. 

 * * * 

3. Plasmic Field: Vital Energy and Creative Drive 

As selection begins to occur, creative activity transitions into the plasmic field. Here, energy becomes mobilized. Emotion, desire, urgency, and momentum surge into the chosen direction, fueling action and iteration. Metaphysically, the plasmic field corresponds to vitality, affect, and creative drive—the experiential force that propels work forward. This is the phase of intensity, where production accelerates and the creator often enters states of flow or deep engagement (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).

Metaphysical Role 

The plasmic field refers to energy in a highly active, fluid and transformational state. Metaphysically, it corresponds to drive, affect, libido, emotional intensity and creative force. – the fuel of creation.

Plasmic Energy Core : ChatGPT5.2

Yet plasmic energy, while essential, is inherently unstable. Without regulation, it risks overwhelming cognition or dissipating into burnout. Design again plays a critical role, not by suppressing intensity, but by channeling it. Through rhythms of work, iterative cycles, and bounded exploration, design transforms raw force into productive motion. Constraint here is not restrictive but enabling. By setting tolerances—what belongs and what does not—design preserves energy for subsequent phases, ensuring that intensity contributes to coherence rather than undermining it (DeLanda, 2016). Without such coordination, plasmic energy manifests as expression without refinement: powerful, but unintelligible.

Attributes 

- High energy density and responsiveness 

- Catalytic, transformative, an unstable 

- Bridges mind-body and emotion-thought 

- Associated with flow states and passion

 Shortcomings 

- Chaotic without guiding structure 

- Can overwhelm cognition and coherence 

- Susceptible to dissipation and burnout 

 

Energetic Mobilization: Plasmic Field 

What happens: Once a direction is chosen, energy surges into it. Emotion, desire, urgency, excitement, and momentum arise. This is the phase where you “make a lot,” rapidly iterate, and feel the work pulling you forward. 

Dominant field: Plasmic (vital intensity / kinetic momentum). 

Design’s function: Keeps intensity productive rather than chaotic. It creates channels, i.e. ideas, for energy—work rhythms, iteration loops, bounded exploration—so the force doesn’t burn out or explode the form. This matches models of creativity emphasizing the energizing function of flow and engagement (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). 

Regulation: Design Constrains Intensity 

What happens: The act must avoid two extremes: over-control (killing energy) or under-control (losing coherence). Regulation is the moment you set tolerances: what belongs, what doesn’t, what the piece can hold. 

Dominant field: Plasmic remains strong, but begins to “cool” into structure. 

Design’s function: Introduces constraint as an enabling condition—boundaries that preserve energy for the next phases. In assemblage/process terms, constraints are not merely limits; they are productive operators that create stable emergence (DeLanda, 2016). 

Without coordination, plasmic energy manifests as raw expression without refinement – intensity without intelligibility. 

                                     * * * 

Fractal Field Concept ChatGPT5.2

4. Fractal Field: Recursive Structure and Self-Similarity 

Metaphysical Role As energy stabilizes, the creative process enters the domain of the fractal field. This field governs recursive structure and self-similarity across scales, allowing patterns discovered at one level to reappear coherently at others. Style, rhythm, proportion, and internal consistency emerge here. Motifs recur, internal rules become visible, and the work begins to exhibit identity across detail, section, and whole. Cognitively and perceptually, this phase aligns with the human tendency to recognize and generate structure through repetition with variation (Mandelbrot, 1982).

Design’s task at this stage is discriminative. It distinguishes meaningful recursion from accidental repetition, identifying which patterns carry identity and ensuring that they scale appropriately. Through articulation and refinement, design converts pattern into language—into composition, schema, and architecture. Periodic reintroductions of novelty from the quantum and plasmic fields prevent fractal recursion from becoming inert repetition or aesthetic stagnation (Kauffman, 1995). In isolation, the fractal field yields order without surprise: coherent, elegant, but lifeless systems.

Attributes 

- Self-similarity across scales 

- Recursive growth and feedback 

- Efficiency of pattern transmission 

- Natural alignment with cognition and perception 

Shortcomings 

- Can wrap creation in repetition 

- Risks aesthetics or conceptual stagnation 

- Requires novelty input from quantum/plasmic fields 

Pattern Stabilization: Fractal Field 

What happens: Repetition appears. Motifs recur. Internal rules become visible. This is where style emerges and the work becomes self-consistent across scales (detail → section → whole). 

Dominant field: Fractal (self-similar structure / scale invariance). 

Design’s function: Distinguishes essential recursion from accidental repetition. It selects which patterns carry identity, and it ensures those pattern's scale. The relationship to fractal dynamics is direct: coherence strengthens when structure repeats with variation (Mandelbrot, 1982). 

Articulation: Design Identifies Essential Patterns 

What happens: You begin to name the work’s grammar: “These are the core forms; these are the supporting forms.” This is editing, refinement, and structural decision-making. 

Dominant field: Fractal, with periodic returns to plasmic (energy) and quantum (novelty). 

Design’s function: Converts pattern into language—composition, system, schema, architecture. It prevents fractal recursion from becoming a loop (beautiful but stagnant) by periodically reintroducing novelty and re-checking purpose (Mandelbrot, 1982; Kauffman, 1995). 

Fractal’s alone yield order without surprise – beautiful but inert systems.

 

                                         * * *

 

Holographic Field ChatGPT5.2

5. Holographic Field: Meaning, Coherence and Wholeness 

Metaphysical Role 

The final integrative phase of creation unfolds within the holographic field. This field is responsible for meaning, coherence, and wholeness. In a holographic system, each part contains information about the whole, and the whole is distributed across its parts. In human creation, this corresponds to symbolic unity, narrative coherence, and the felt sense that a work “means something” beyond its components. Meaning is no longer added from the outside; it emerges from the internal resonance of the system itself (Bohm, 1980; Pribram, 1991).

Design here functions as semantic harmonization. It aligns intention, form, and perception, testing whether the artifact carries its meaning without explanation and whether its parts mutually reinforce one another. Coherence at this level is experiential rather than purely logical, resonating with enactive theories of cognition and meaning-making (Varela et al., 1991). Conceptually, the holographic field is best understood as a distributed encoding medium rather than a localized structure. Information is stored in interference patterns, not discrete symbols, and meaning emerges only through coherent engagement.

The Holographic field integrates all other fields into a meaningful whole, where each part reflects the totality. In human creation, this corresponds to symbolic unity, narrative coherence, and lived meaning. 

If visualized, a holographic field would appear as a volumetric interference lattice: translucent, depth-rich, and without a privileged center. Structure would be revealed through parallax and perspective rather than surface shading. Information would be encoded in phase relationships, visible only when interrogated by movement, attention, or coherence. Zooming into any region would reveal self-similar structures containing a distorted yet complete image of the whole, overlapping visually with fractal geometry while maintaining informational completeness. Forms would stabilize briefly under observation, then dissolve, giving the impression that the field responds to attention rather than passively existing. Memory-like afterimages—ghosted echoes of prior configurations—would suggest a stored history embedded in spatial patterning. Ideas (images) run rampant within a holographic framework.

Attributes 

- Whole-in-part encoding 

- Non-local coherence of information 

- Alignment of perception, memory, and intention 

- Resonance with consciousness and interpretation. 

Shortcomings 

- Dependent upon underlying energetic and structural fields 

- Susceptible to distortion if coherence is forced 

- Cannot generate energy of novelty independently 

Meaning Integration: Holographic Field 

What happens: The work becomes about something in a way that can be felt. Each part begins to “contain” the whole—your signature appears, not as branding but as coherence. This corresponds to holonomic/holographic metaphors where distributed encoding enables part–whole resonance (Pribram, 1991; Bohm, 1980). 

Dominant field: Holographic (whole-in-part resonance / felt coherence). 

Design’s function: Aligns intention, form, and perception. 

It asks: does the artifact carry its meaning without explanation? Are the parts mutually reinforcing? Here design operates as semantic harmonization—coherence that is experiential, not merely logical (Varela et al., 1991).

Conceptually, a holographic field is best understood not as a single surface or volume, but as a distributed encoding medium in which every local region contains information about the whole. If one were to visualize it, several core characteristics would dominate its appearance: 

1. Volumetric Interference Lattice 

A holographic field would appear as a three-dimensional interference pattern rather than discrete objects. 

• Fine, repeating wavefronts intersecting at multiple angles 

• Moiré-like patterns that shift as the observer’s perspective changes 

• No privileged center: structure is everywhere and nowhere simultaneously Visually, this resembles overlapping translucent grids or wave-nets suspended in space, with depth revealed through parallax rather than shading. 

2. Phase-Encoded Transparency 

Unlike a solid or energetic field, a holographic field would be mostly transparent, yet richly structured. 

• Information encoded in phase, not amplitude 

• Subtle ripples, striations, and banding rather than bright emissions 

• Changes become visible only when “interrogated” by perspective, motion, or coherence 

(This aligns with physical holography, where an image emerges only when illuminated by a coherent reference beam.)

3. Recursive Self-Similarity 

Zooming into any region of the field would reveal the same structural logic at multiple scales. 

• Large interference arcs resolve into smaller lattices 

• Each fragment contains a distorted but complete version of the whole 

• Boundaries dissolve into nested repetitions 

This is where the holographic field visually overlaps with fractal geometry, but with informational completeness rather than infinite detail. 

4. Observer-Dependent Emergence 

A defining visual feature would be that forms only stabilize when observed. 

• Shapes appear to “lock in” briefly, then dissolve 

• Apparent objects are standing wave intersections, not persistent entities 

• The field looks different depending on angle, distance, and focus 

In experiential terms, it would feel as though the field is responding to observation rather than passively existing. 

5. Memory-Like Afterimages 

Because holographic systems encode persistence through interference, the field might exhibit: 

• Ghosted echoes of previous configurations 

• Overlapping temporal layers, like multiple exposures 

• A sense of stored history embedded in spatial patterning. This lends the field a mnemonic quality, consistent with interpretations of holography in consciousness and memory theory. 

6. Symbolic Analogy 

Within your yet to be completed DAC / 14-Gate framework, the holographic field functions not as an action field but as a context field—the substrate where perception, memory, and identity co-inhere. Geometrically, it aligns with spherical or dodecahedral volumes and wave-based interpretations of sacred geometry lattices such as the Flower of Life or Metatron’s Cube. It appears quiet rather than energetic, deep rather than chaotic, and infinitely informative despite minimal visual density where semi-transparent layers encode multiple epistemic gates simultaneously. 

If you could see a holographic field, it would not look “energetic” in the plasmic sense or “chaotic” in the quantum sense. It would appear: 

• Quiet 

• Deep 

• Patterned 

• Perspective-sensitive 

• Infinitely informative despite minimal visual density.

* * *

Harmonization: Design Aligns Form and Symbol 

What happens: Final integration and “lock-in.” Contradictions are resolved or made deliberately meaningful. The work’s surface and depth agree. Dominant field: Holographic, supported by fractal structure and regulated plasmic energy. 

Design’s function: Performs coherence-testing: remove an element—does the whole weaken? Replace a motif, does the identity break? Harmonization is where the piece becomes resilient: a coherent whole whose parts are necessary rather than arbitrary (Bohm, 1980; Pribram, 1991).

The final act of creation involves harmonization: contradictions are resolved or rendered deliberately meaningful, surface and depth come into agreement, and the work achieves resilience. Removing an element weakens the whole; altering a motif breaks identity. This is coherence-testing at the highest level, where meaning, structure, and energy are fully integrated (Bohm, 1980; Pribram, 1991). Without support from the other fields, however, the holographic domain collapses into symbolism without vitality—coherence without embodiment. 

Importantly, completion does not terminate the creative process. Integration often reopens possibility. Meaning generates new questions, which reopen quantum potential, mobilize new energy, stabilize new patterns, and deepen coherence. Design maintains this controlled recursion, ensuring that emergence proceeds through iterative cycles of constraint and novelty rather than uncontrolled repetition (Kauffman, 1995; Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). 

A successful creative act therefore requires temporal coordination rather than dominance. The quantum field opens possibilities, the plasmic field energizes intention, the fractal field stabilizes patterns, and the holographic field integrates meaning. This sequence is recursive and non-linear. 

Failure occurs when one field overwhelms the others: excess quantum produces indecision, excess plasmic yields chaos, excess fractal leads to rigidity, and excess holographic results in abstraction without embodiment.

Coordination Dynamics in Creation Functional Integration 

A successful creative act requires temporal Coordination 

1. Quantum Field is filled with potential opening possibilities 

2. Plasmic Field energizes the intention and desires 

3. Fractal Field stabilizes patterns 

4. Holographic Field integrates meaning 

This sequence is non-linear and recursive, not hierarchical. 

Failure modes 

- Excess quantum – fragmentation, indecision 

- Excess plasmic – chaos, incoherence 

- Excess fractal – rigidity, cliché 

- Excess holographic – abstraction without embodiment 

Creation fails when one field dominates rather than participates. Creation emerges when fields synchronize with intent. 

Design functions as 

 - A translator between quantum (QFVPP) possibility and holographic meaning 

- A regulator of plasmic intensity 

- A curator of fractal recursion. Thus, human creation becomes a synchronistic event not merely an act of expression. 

From a design-conscious perspective, design is the mediating intelligence that aligns a grand assortment of fields of energy in motion. It translates quantum possibility into holographic meaning, regulates plasmic intensity, and curates fractal recursion. Human creation, under this model, is not merely an expressive output, but a synchronistic event—a coordinated convergence of energy, structure, meaning and purpose into a coherent act of becoming.

References (APA) 

- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.

- Bohm, D., & Hiley, B.J. (1993) The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Routledge

- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row. 

- DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press. 

- Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper. 

- Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press. 

- Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman. 

- Pribram, K. H. (1991). Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books. 

- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

* * *

What is design?

What isn't?

Edited: 

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2026 C.G. Garant. 

(DAC) An Agency of Change

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

A Sequential Methodology for Balancing Change within the DAC Framework 

Within the metaphysical orientation of the Design/Awareness/Consciousness (DAC) model, change is not a random disturbance imposed upon a static reality. Rather, change is understood as an orchestrated movement of consciousness through structured fields of meaning, possibility, and form. To apply a balanced methodology of change requires more than simply acting upon the world; it requires the coordinated alignment of several foundational elements: ontology, semiosis, dynamics, temporality, creativity, causality, structure, and epistemology. Each of these elements represents a distinct dimension of the design process, and together they compose the full cycle through which consciousness reorganizes itself and its environment. 

A typical or sequential scenario for applying balanced change within DAC begins with ontology ... the grounding recognition of what is assumed to exist. Ontology functions as the initial zero point horizon of design consciousness, defining the field of what is considered real, meaningful, and actionable (Heidegger, 1962). Before any transformation can occur, the designer/observer must first encounter a state of being that calls for reconfiguration. In metaphysical terms, this is the moment when the current “operating system” of reality no longer suffices to accommodate emerging needs and intentions. The ontological layer therefore establishes the raw material upon which change will be enacted: the perceived world, the self, and their relationship. 

From ontology emerges semiosis, the process by which experiences are translated into symbols and meanings. Within the DAC model, semiosis is the mechanism through which the designer interprets the ontological field and begins to recognize patterns of significance (Peirce, 1931–1958). No change can be initiated without the capacity to name, frame, and interpret what is occurring. Signs convert undifferentiated experience into communicable structure; they allow the observer to recognize discrepancies between what is and what is desired. In this sense, semiosis serves as the bridge between being and becoming, translating raw existence into actionable information. 

Once meaning has been generated, the element of dynamics becomes active. Dynamics refers to the energetic movements and tensions that propel systems toward transformation. Drawing from process philosophy, reality may be understood as a field of continual becoming rather than fixed substance (Whitehead, 1978). Within DAC, dynamics represent the felt pressures of imbalance, aspiration, and intention that demand reorganization. The designer experiences dynamics as motivation, conflict, or creative unrest, signals that the current configuration of elements is insufficient. 

Temporality enters next as the contextual field within which change unfolds. All design occurs in time, and time itself is not merely a neutral container but an active dimension shaping possibilities (Bergson, 1911). The DAC methodology recognizes that past experiences, present awareness, and future intentions interact continuously. A balanced approach to change therefore requires temporal sensitivity: understanding when to act, when to wait, and how to sequence interventions so that they align with natural rhythms of development. 

Creativity follows as the generative response to dynamic tension within temporal context. Creativity in the DAC model is not simply artistic novelty but the capacity of consciousness to reconfigure existing elements into new forms (Bohm, 1998). At this stage the designer imagines alternative structures, solutions, and pathways. Creativity provides the visionary blueprint that allows new possibilities to enter the field of experience. Without this imaginative leap, change would remain purely reactive rather than genuinely transformative. 

Causality then organizes creative insight into coherent chains of influence. Within a metaphysical design framework, causality is not strictly linear but participatory and multi-directional; intentions, perceptions, and structures mutually affect one another (Bohm, 1980). The DAC practitioner must therefore consider how proposed actions will reverberate across multiple levels of the system. Balanced change requires causal awareness: an understanding of how small adjustments in one domain can produce large effects in another. 

Structure emerges as the crystallization of causal intention into stable form. Every act of change ultimately seeks embodiment—new habits, systems, artifacts, or conceptual frameworks (Simon, 1969). Structure provides continuity and coherence, allowing creative ideas to take root in durable configurations. In DAC terms, structure is the moment when potential becomes actualized design. 

Finally, epistemology completes the cycle by reflecting upon what has been learned through the process. Epistemology concerns how knowledge is generated, validated, and integrated (Polanyi, 1966). After structural changes are implemented, the designer reassesses their assumptions, interpretations, and outcomes. This reflective stage updates the original ontology, thereby initiating a new round of semiosis and transformation. Balanced change is therefore not a single event but a recursive spiral of learning and redesign. 

When these eight elements are approached sequentially and holistically, the DAC model offers a comprehensive methodology for harmonizing the forces of transformation. Ontology provides the field, semiosis the language, dynamics the motive power, temporality the rhythm, creativity the vision, causality the logic, structure the embodiment, and epistemology the wisdom. Imbalance occurs whenever one element dominates at the expense of the others for example, when creativity runs unchecked by structure, or when rigid ontology resists necessary dynamics. The art of metaphysical design lies in maintaining equilibrium among all dimensions so that change unfolds as an integrated expression of conscious intention. 

Thus, the balanced application of energy across these elements constitutes a practical path for intentional evolution. Change within DAC is not merely something that happens to consciousness; it is something consciousness learns to design. 

References (APA) 

- Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. Henry Holt. 

- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. 

- Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. Routledge. 

- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927) 

- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press. 

- Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press. 

- Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press. 

- Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (Corrected ed.). Free Press. 

The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

What is design?

What isn't?

Edited: 

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2026 C.G. Garant.