Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Squaring the Circle is Not What You Think

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

 * * *

The mathematical challenge of squaring the circle originated with the ancient Greek mathematicians and geometers. The problem was to construct for a given circle a square with the same area as the circle, all to be done with only a compass and straightedge. It was repeatedly demonstrated that the challenge was impossible to do. 

The circle represented woman, spirit and infinite wholeness, the square man, earthly circumstances and all things material. Ancient Greek philosophers distinguished all things material within the context of fours, e.g. the seasons of the year, the elements of earth, air, fire and water. Squaring the circle was proven to be algebraically impossible until 1882 when the Lindermann-Weierstrass theorem proved that pi π is transcendental and not an algebraic irrational number.

* * *

“Philosophically and spiritually, to square the circle means to see equally in four directions—up, down, in, and out—and to be whole, complete, and free. Circles often represent the spiritual because they are infinite—they have no end. The square is often a symbol of the material because of the number of physical things that come in fours, such as four seasons (4), four directions (4), and the four physical elements (4)earth, air, fire, and water, (4x3=12) according to ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles—not to mention its solid appearance. 

The union of man and woman in alchemy is a merging of spiritual and physical natures. The triangle is then a symbol of the resulting union of body, mind, and soul. In the 17th century, squaring the circle had not yet been proved impossible. However, it was a puzzle no one had been known to solve. Alchemy was viewed very similarly: It was something few if any had ever fully completed. The study of alchemy was as much about the journey as the goal, as no one might ever actually forge a philosopher’s stone.” 

* * *

In reference to Design Consciousness, the concept of “squaring the circle” is based upon the pursuit of balance and harmony during the process of manifestation and transfiguration (design). The square symbolizing the Earth (Yin) being made tangible and formative and the circle symbolizing the Heavens (Yang) being intangible and formless. Two opposing geometries meant to describe two opposing principles in balance, whole and complete. Together this relationship extends beyond their simple geometry to represent a profound philosophical and spiritual journey, i.e. The Path. 

Union of opposites and the path to wholeness 

To begin, all that can be known in 3D spacetime is first conveyed symbolically in the form of a point (.) From another perspective in relative perpendicularity this same point will appear as a line ( _______ ). A point in motion creates a line or vector.

All lines can also be prescribed as being a vector, i.e. a measurable quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially if/when determining the position of one point made in reference to another point along that same line ( < ---------- > ).

This additional quality imbues the line with meaning and purpose, which effectively assigns it a value. In this same context, a vector may be interpreted as a scalar, depending upon the frame of reference of the observer. 

A circle represents the infinite, divine, and spiritual: Circles have no beginning or end, making them a natural representation of the eternal, the spiritual realm, and the divine or subconscious aspects of the self. 



Metaphysically, the process by which a point expands to become a circle can be thought of as a shift from pure potentiality (point) into a manifested form (circle)—a  metaphysical leap from the concept of unity or singularity towards multiplicity and structure. This transformation carries deep symbolic and philosophical implications, often explored in metaphysics, geometry, and mysticism.

* * *

Metaphysical Implications, Differences and Interpretations

• Origination: In Platonic thought the point overflows into circle; in Hermetic thought the point manifests the circle in cycles; in Vedanta the point  realizes it is the circle. 

• Hierarchy vs. unity: Platonic/Neoplatonic emphasize levels; Hermetic emphasize correspondence and cycles; Vedantic emphasizes radical unity. 

• Motion and vector analogy: Hermetic is perhaps strongest in suggesting motion (energy in motion) (circle → spiral) and thus vector-like expansion. Platonic uses more static metaphors of “participation”. Vedanta uses expanding awareness rather than physical vectors. 

• Symbolic use of circle: For Platonists the circle symbolizes perfection and ideal form; for Hermeticists it symbolizes cycles of manifestation; for Vedantins it symbolizes infinite consciousness

Centre/circumference relations: 
Platonic: centre (One) transcends, circumference is the many
Hermetic: centre and circumference interplay, movement outward/inward, spiral. 
Vedantic: the centre is everywhere, the circumference nowhere – emphasizing the infinite immanence of the centre. 

In reference to design consciousness the transition, translation and transformation of energy in motion (EIM) from a point into a circle embraces all three interpretations brought to mind by these philosophies.

* * *

If you adopt a metaphorical or geometrical reading, vectors (i.e., directed lines from a centre to the periphery) can be included in all three traditions, though to varying degrees and with different emphases: 
• In Platonic/Neoplatonic scheme: one might imagine countless vectors from the One to each emanated being or Form; these vectors represent the mode of participation or derivation. 

What might be considered a Hermetic interpretation of a circle.

In Hermetic tradition: more overtly you have radial vectors (emanation lines), circular/spiral motion (vectors along a circumference plus vectors advancing the centre). So vectors symbolize movement of the centre of motion, or advance of life. 
• In Vedantic scheme: you could metaphorically think of vectors of consciousness radiating outward (individual to universal) or inward (recognition of the universal in the individual). However, the primary emphasis is not on physical vector motion but on awareness expanding

What might be considered both Platonic and/or Vedantic.

In each case, the “point to circle” metaphor can be viewed as "center plus radial vectors gives circumference/multiplicity". How one interprets or emphasizes those “radial vectors” differs: 
• Are they arrows of emanation (Platonic)? 
• Are they arrows of cyclical motion and transformation (Hermetic)? 
• Are they arrows of conscious expansion or realisation (Vedantic)? 

Summary & Conclusion 
• The image of a point expanding into a circle is a rich metaphysical metaphor used in multiple traditions to depict the transition from unity to multiplicity, from potential to manifestation, from singular awareness to universal being. 
• In the Platonic / Neoplatonic tradition it captures emanation from the One into the many, with a hierarchical structure. 
• In the Hermetic tradition it captures manifestation in cycles, with motion (including radial and spiral aspects) emphasized, and the interplay of center and circumference. 
• In the Vedantic tradition it captures the infinite nature of consciousness: the individual (point) realizes it is the universal (circle), with the center everywhere and circumference nowhere
• Vectors — understood as directed lines of movement, connection, or expansion — can play a role in all three, but are most explicitly used in Hermeticism. In Platonic thought they are more implicit, and in Vedanta they serve as metaphors for awareness rather than literal motion
 
Four elements (the square) shifting from potential (point) into form (circle)
about a source of observation
Earth, Air, Water, Fire

Squares representing the finite, earthly, and material: Squares are defined by four sides and corners, signifying the physical world, the tangible, the rational mind, and the grounded, conscious aspects of the self.


Eight elements (an octagon) in full manifestation about a
source of observation
North, South, East, West

The concept of squaring the circle is not a mathematical or geometrical problem, but rather the expression of a "metaphysical principle" where duality creates the context where the concept of unity is observed within the parametric constraints of human consciousness. 

Two overlapping squares surrounding the observer within the margins of a circle make reference to the challenges about to be experienced within the earthly sphere of three dimensional spacetime. They likewise attend to a context that inspires creativity while simultaneously accommodating growth and expansion through the experience of the observer.

* * *

In metaphysics, the octagon symbolizes the transitional space between the earthy square and the spiritual circle, representing a state of renewal, rebirth, and the unification of the material and the divine. It signifies new beginnings, regeneration after a cycle, and the interconnectedness of heaven and earth. The number eight (8) is also associated with cosmic balance and eternal life in various traditions, further enhancing the octagon's meaning of transformation and spiritual growth. 

Design Metaphysics: The Octagon
The eight-sided polygon known as an octagon, signifies harmony and resonance. The intersection and relationship of two overlapping squares creates an eight-pointed star symbolized by the sun, i.e. the star that represents the center of our solar system. 

The sun is an energy source that is continuously regenerating itself every moment. The sun exemplifies change. The eightfold pattern repeatedly vibrates in sympathy within the source of its own frequency. The octad is structured about the parameters of an even greater network.* 

The sun represents the beginnings of a new source being "formed" within a field of greater complexity. The sun is perceived as a keynote and single point of origin. The sun is a source of harmony, a symbol of energy in motion, an involuntary force finding its own equilibrium within the infinity of the cosmos. The sun takes on the form of a nucleus and at the center of a system of energy that harbors a complex mathematical geometry. Multiple configurations and patterns of energy in motion are in perpetual transition and transformation as they swirl about this central core of attraction. 

* * *



Key Metaphysical Interpretations 

• Transition and Unity: The octagon bridges the square (representing the material world, stability, and earth) and the circle (representing the spiritual world, eternity, and heaven). It is the point where one energy begins its transformation into another, uniting these two fundamental concepts. 
• Sacred geometry: The most common metaphysical interpretation is that the octagon is a mediating form between the square (Earth, matter) and the circle (heaven, spirit). This makes it a symbol of the spiritual path toward enlightenment or the unification of material and spiritual existence. 
• Regeneration and Cycle Completion: The shape is a symbol of regeneration and structured renewal, marking the completion of a universal cycle and the commencement of a new one. 
• Spiritual Growth and Defense: In Feng Shui, an octagonal mirror is recommended for protection against negative spiritual activity. The form's multiple angles are also associated with comprehensive awareness, defensiveness, and a readiness to assess and yield momentum. 
• The Bagua Map: The Western Bagua Map, a tool for self-development, is also octagonal, with each of the eight sections relating to a different aspect of life that supports the individual. 

Balance and Cosmic order 
Wholeness: The eight sides of the octagon can represent a quest for wholeness by balancing different aspects of existence, such as intellect, emotion, body, and spirit. 
Google Research 

* * *

* * *

The mark of Design Consciousness is based upon the overlapping of two squares (regular quadrilaterals) of equal size representing the Yin and Yang energies of energy in motion. Together they symbolize the concept of duality, i.e. that which permeates all that can be known. Together they create the points and framework of an octagon. The thrust is of this energy is towards the northeast. 



In the I Ching, the directions are often associated with elements, energies, and specific qualities. The northeast has a strong connection to the Earth element and the concept of stillness or quiet wisdom. It is linked to the idea of stability, grounding, and inner strength. 

* * *

Specific meanings associated with the northeast direction in the I Ching: 
Stability & Grounding: The northeast represents a place of solid foundation, where one can find inner clarity and balance. It is about being grounded, firm, and having a strong base from which to act. 
Quiet Reflection: This direction is also tied to introspection and calm, where one can find peace and clarity. It's a space for reflection, connecting to one's deeper wisdom, and evaluating situations without rushing to decisions. 
Transformation & Preparation: The northeast is seen as a transitional space, where you prepare for new cycles and developments. It has a connection to learning from past experiences and gaining insight to apply in the future. 

In many classical Chinese traditions, the northeast is linked with the 8th trigram, Ken (☷), which symbolizes mountains and stillness. The mountain represents immobility, which can help in fostering patience, stability, and mental fortitude. 

In practical terms, the northeast is often considered an auspicious direction for cultivating wisdom, understanding, and a strong sense of self before taking action.



 * * *

3 squares = 12 points (4 directions + 4 elements + 4 seasons)

Earthly experience

The dodecagon, as a twelve-sided polygon, offers the observer a holistic perspective of the three-dimensional world, creating a map for consciousness that reveals holographic pathways and non-measurable parameters. Such a synthesis reflects both ancient symbolic geometry and modern theories of holographic information (Bohm, 1980; Talbot, 1991). Light energy and information overlap, creating luminous layers that blur distinctions between measurable and immeasurable qualities—an interplay reminiscent of the observer effect and the entanglement of perception and matter (Barad, 2007; Wheeler, 1983). 

That which can be measured influences that which cannot, and vice versa. This mutual influence echoes the quantum indeterminacy that underpins consciousness theories linking cognition and energy fields (Penrose, 1994; Hameroff & Penrose, 2014). Within the linear 3D time spiral, each imagined state of consciousness gives birth to the next, forming a holographic sequencing of present, past, and future — an idea also found in process philosophy and cybernetic design (Braidotti, 2019; Hayles, 1999). 
* * *
Earthly Parameters


Being drawn to this center is an integral part of the design process. This focal point is symbolic of a holographic source and precursor to the entrance into another universe. After certain attributes are fully experienced, explored and understood as a single strand of consciousness woven within a string of universes, certain mysteries collapse upon themselves, which in turn reveal other attributes of a unique geometry, holographic representations and dimensional interpretation. 


At the hub of the dodecagon lies an unknown center — a source, akin to a black hole of awareness, symbolizing a metaphysical origin point. Recognition of this “center” parallels both mystical traditions and contemporary design thinking that seeks emergent meaning through iterative feedback loops (Verbeek, 2011; Latour, 2005). The pull toward this enigmatic center mirrors the creative process — a holographic design journey between order and potentiality.


" The dodecagon 
symbolizes time, its relationship to space and the location of energy in the form of holographic light and information. Together these referential points of quantum energy describe the qualities of the solar field. Holographic in character and designed by attraction and intention, each component triad (4) is an expression of a micro system that internally symbolizes the achievements of a larger macro system functioning in apparent balance. When the dodecagon is viewed within the constraints of this universe both time and space take on a new meaning and purpose. Time becomes the thread that sews all holograms together by making them apparent within the parameters of a virtual field of quantum energy (QFVPP). Time creates the condition. Time is the tool that brings meaning and purpose (design) into context when experiencing the three dimensional universe."


The symbolic completeness of twelve—found in DNA, the zodiac, time cycles, and cultural cosmologies—represents wholeness and systemic balance (Eliade, 1959). Within this geometry, the dodecagon becomes both an archetype and a design framework connecting microcosm and macrocosm, each reflecting the other (Floridi, 2014). When viewed through the lens of metaphysical design, time itself becomes a tool—a medium that weaves holographic experiences into a unified quantum field (Bohm, 1980; Wheeler, 1983).

12 Transcendent Design Principles 
Truth, Beauty, Goodness
Light, Power, Love
Emotion, Intuition, Intelligence
Believing, Feeling, Knowing

Humanity Transcendent




The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

References (APA 7th Edition) 
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. 
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press. 
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. 
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. 
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press. 
Talbot, M. (1991). The holographic universe. Harper Perennial. 
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.
(Moralizing Technology and the ethics of things / Peter-Paul Verbeek / TEDxTwenteU) 
Wheeler, J. A. (1983). Law without law. In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 182–213). Princeton University Press. 

* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous







Edited: 10.30.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 





Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Abstract Technology and the Designer's Role


Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

What is considered Abstract Technology?
In the context of design consciousness and its relationship with AI, the term abstract technology typically refers to technologies that are not immediately tangible or physical but instead operate on conceptual, systemic, or algorithmic levels. These technologies influence how we perceive, create, and interact with the world—especially through information structures, computational logic, and invisible infrastructures. 

1. Algorithmic Systems 
These are sets of rules or computations that govern behavior and decision-making, especially within AI. The design of an algorithm is abstract—its impact is visible (e.g., in search results, recommendations), but the system itself remains invisible. 
Example: A recommendation engine shaping user behavior through invisible logic. 

2. Data Structures and Ontologies 
These are conceptual frameworks for how information is categorized, stored, and retrieved. In AI, how data is labeled, sorted, and related (e.g., in a neural network or database) deeply impacts both functionality and user perception. 
Example: The classification system behind an AI image recognition tool. 

3. Machine Learning Models
Models like GPT, diffusion models, or reinforcement learning agents are built from abstract representations of language, behavior, or the world. Their structure and training processes are not directly visible but are central to how AI interprets or generates meaning. 
Example: GPT "understanding" a query through high-dimensional vector space. 

4. User Interface Logic and UX Flows 
The structure and flow of digital interfaces are abstractly designed—users experience outcomes, but the logic trees and decision structures behind those interfaces are conceptual in nature. 
Example: AI-assisted design tools predicting what a user wants to create before they know it themselves. 

5. Ethical Frameworks and Governance Systems 
Abstract technology also includes the normative structures embedded in AI—how ethics, bias mitigation, or transparency are programmed (or not) into systems. 
Example: The ethical constraints embedded into autonomous vehicle decision-making. 

6. AI Consciousness Simulations (Theoretical) When exploring design consciousness, we may refer to the design of systems that simulate or model consciousness. These are extremely abstract, as they involve representations of awareness, intention, or self-modeling in AI systems. 
Example: An AI system designed to reflect on its own decision-making or simulate empathy. 

Relationship with Design Consciousness 
In design consciousness, creators and thinkers become aware of not just how things look or function, but how systems shape meaning, agency, and experience. Abstract technologies are crucial here because they mediate perception and agency invisibly, often outside user awareness. 

So, abstract technology in this context is the immaterial layer of computation, logic, and structure that defines how AI operates—and how we, as users or designers, relate to it.

* * *

Designer & AI Relationships: From Tools to Co-Evolutionary Partners 

The relationship between designers and artificial intelligence (AI) is undergoing a profound transformation, moving beyond the simple framework of human control over technical instruments. As AI systems become increasingly generative, adaptive, and context-sensitive, the dynamics of design practice shift toward more nuanced partnerships. These relationships may be framed along a continuum that spans from traditional tool-use to co-evolutionary collaboration, with ethical stewardship acting as an essential counterbalance throughout. 

AI as Instrument and Extension 

The most foundational relationship between designer and AI is that of tool and user. In this paradigm, AI serves as a powerful extension of human intention, enabling designers to automate routine or technical aspects of their work—such as layout optimization, prototyping, and parameter exploration. This framework reflects what Shneiderman (2020) has described as human-centered artificial intelligence, where the role of AI is to enhance human performance while maintaining reliability, safety, and trustworthiness. The designer, in this sense, retains full creative agency, positioning AI as an advanced but still subordinate instrument. 

AI as Collaborative Partner 

As AI technologies evolve, however, they increasingly operate in ways that exceed the tool metaphor. Contemporary design practice often involves AI systems capable of generating novel patterns, forms, or solutions that surprise even their creators. In these contexts, AI can be conceptualized as a collaborative partner, one that contributes to the ideation process alongside human creativity. Davis et al. (2021) argue that co-creativity arises through interaction dynamics, where the iterative exchange between human and machine generates outcomes neither could have produced independently. This collaborative model destabilizes traditional hierarchies of authorship, suggesting a more dialogical form of creativity. 

AI as Creative Catalyst 

Beyond collaboration, AI can also act as a provocateur or catalyst for new ideas. By producing outputs that diverge from established human expectations, AI systems challenge designers to reconsider assumptions, aesthetic conventions, and conceptual boundaries. Colton and Wiggins (2012) position this role within the broader field of computational creativity, where AI functions less as a passive servant and more as an active agent capable of generating novelty. In this way, the relationship becomes less about efficiency and more about inspiration, allowing designers to leverage AI as a source of unexpected creative disruption.



AI and Co-Evolutionary Design 

The relationship between designers and AI is not static but inherently adaptive. Designers train, fine-tune, and guide AI systems, while at the same time AI reshapes the practices, skills, and sensibilities of designers themselves. This co-evolutionary dynamic reflects what Candy and Edmonds (2018) describe as the future of practice-based creative research, wherein human and machine adapt to one another in an ongoing feedback loop. Here, the boundaries between human agency and machine affordances blur, pointing toward a hybrid model of design where creativity emerges from mutual adaptation. 

The Ethical Counterpart 

While much discussion emphasizes creativity and efficiency, the designer’s role in relation to AI must also be understood as one of ethical responsibility. AI systems are not value-neutral; they reflect the biases of their training data and the intentions of their creators. Designers thus act as ethical stewards, embedding considerations of justice, equity, and accountability into their collaborations with AI. Brennen (2020) highlights the urgent need to address misinformation, manipulation, and social harm in the digital era—an imperative that extends to the domain of design. In this respect, the relationship between designer and AI becomes one not only of co-creation but also of critical oversight. 

Conclusion 

The relationship between designers and AI cannot be reduced to a single static model. Instead, it spans a spectrum that begins with instrumental tool-use, extends through collaborative and catalytic partnerships, and evolves into reflexive co-adaptation. Overlaying all of these dimensions is the ethical imperative, where designers must critically engage with the implications of their collaborations. As AI continues to evolve, so too will the relational landscape of design, pointing toward futures where human creativity and artificial intelligence are inseparably intertwined. 

References 

Brennen, J. S. (2020). Making sense of lies, misinformation, and conspiracy theories in the digital age. Media and Communication, 8(2), 1–4.

Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69. 

Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 21–26). 

Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-P., Yashraj Singh, K., Li, L., & Magerko, B. (2021). Creative sense-making: Quantifying interaction dynamics in co-creative systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 149, 102605.  

Shneiderman, B. (2020). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous




Edited: Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 


The Tridecagon

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.


Exploring the metaphysical relationship between the shape of a tridecagon (13-sided polygon) and the domains of quantum physics, semiotics, psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, aesthetics, science, and design theory requires treating the tridecagon as more than a geometric object. Instead, it becomes a symbolic, structural, and metaphysical mediator—a site where form meets meaning, perception, cognition, and systems. The number 13, often culturally and mathematically charged, further contributes layers of interpretation across fields. 

* * *

The Tridecagon and Metaphysical Interwovenness Across Disciplines 

1. Metaphysics and the Symbolic Form 

In metaphysical terms, a geometric form like the tridecagon can be considered an abstract universal, expressing order, boundary, and relational unity. Plato (c. 380 BCE/1997) considered geometric forms as metaphysical ideals—non-material essences perceived through reason rather than sense. The tridecagon, as an uncommon and asymmetrical polygon, becomes a symbol of unresolved complexity and marginal stability—a metaphysical threshold between order and chaos. Its 13-fold symmetry resists easy integration into common tiling systems, challenging assumptions about total symmetry and reflecting metaphysical tensions between unity and multiplicity (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). 

2. Quantum Physics: Irregularity and Probabilistic Structure 

Quantum physics is defined by uncertainty, probability, and wave-function superposition (Heisenberg, 1927; Barad, 2007). The tridecagon, lacking perfect symmetry for tessellation and resisting crystalline regularity, can metaphorically reflect the non-determinism and boundary conditions found in quantum systems. Like quantum particles, the tridecagon occupies a liminal space—neither regular nor chaotic. It could be seen as a geometric metaphor for quantum decoherence, where structure emerges from indeterminacy (Zurek, 2003). 

3. Semiotics: The Sign of the Irregular Whole 

In semiotic terms, the tridecagon operates as a signifier of non-conformity and multiplicity. Unlike commonly recognized shapes (circle, square, triangle), the tridecagon is rarely encountered, making it a marked forma sign whose rarity enhances its symbolic load (Eco, 1976). The number 13 itself is semantically overcoded with cultural, mystical, and numerological meanings, often associated with liminality, transgression, or otherness (Levi, 1999). Thus, the tridecagon functions semiotically as a sign of the anomalous, suggesting that form itself is always culturally coded and context-dependent (Barthes, 1972). 

4. Psychology: Perceptual and Cognitive Boundaries 

In cognitive psychology, perception of geometric shapes is filtered through Gestalt principles, which prefer symmetry, closure, and simplicity (Wertheimer, 1923/1938). The tridecagon, being irregular and uncommon, resists immediate recognition, thus engaging deeper cognitive processing. This makes it a useful metaphor for the edge of perceptual comfort—the boundary where known patterns break down and novelty arises (Ramachandran & Hirstein, 1999). Psychologically, the shape can induce a sense of tension, curiosity, or even the uncanny—a response linked to irregularity in otherwise expected systems. 

5. Artificial Intelligence: Pattern Recognition and Neural Representation 

In AI, pattern recognition systems—especially deep learning models—are optimized to detect common shapes and regularities (Goodfellow et al., 2016). A tridecagon presents a challenge for classification due to its marginal distinction from the circle or dodecagon. Its detection requires higher-level abstraction and flexible representation, mirroring AI’s shift from symbolic logic to probabilistic and connectionist approaches. Metaphysically, the tridecagon becomes a symbol of non-obvious knowledge and emergent patternwhat AI must evolve to comprehend in unstructured data environments (Mitchell, 2019). 

6. Philosophy: The Figure of Otherness and Becoming 

Philosophically, the tridecagon can be interpreted through post-structural and postmodern lenses as a figure of difference and becoming. Deleuze (1994) emphasizes repetition with difference as the engine of reality. The tridecagon, by defying easy repetition, becomes a form of difference that repeats but never aligns, metaphorically resonating with the fluid identity and decentralization of subjectivity. Its “oddness” invites reflection on the Otherthe shape that doesn’t conform, doesn’t fit, yet is part of the total system of shapes and meaning (Levinas, 1969). 

7. Aesthetics: Asymmetry and the Beautiful Strange 

In aesthetics, the tridecagon stands at the edge of the beautiful and the sublime. Its slight asymmetry and structural instability can evoke both visual intrigue and cognitive discomfort. Japanese aesthetics, for example, value wabi-sabi—the imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete (Juniper, 2003). The tridecagon fits this ethos, offering aesthetic resistance to perfection and reminding us that beauty can emerge from irregular complexity. It invites the aesthetic appreciation of form as tension, not only harmony.



8. Science: Complexity and Marginal Forms 

In scientific modeling, especially in morphology and complexity theory, the tridecagon might appear in non-Euclidean systems, protein folding, or biological patterning where irregularity encodes adaptation (Capra, 1996). As a polygon that does not easily tessellate, it reflects nature’s tendency toward quasi-regular forms, neither chaotic nor entirely symmetrical. Its study can lead to insights into topology, emergent structure, and boundary conditions in complex systems (Kauffman, 1993). 

9. Design Theory: Constraint, Modularity, and Non-Canonical Form 

In design theory, the tridecagon represents the edge of modular coherence. Most modular systems favor 3, 4, 6, or 12-sided units for simplicity and tiling. The 13-sided form introduces intentional constraint and disruption, a design tactic used to challenge expectation and provoke thought (Lawson, 2005). As such, the tridecagon exemplifies non-canonical geometry that forces designers to reconsider grid logic, space, and visual hierarchyopening room for speculative or critical design approaches (Dunne & Raby, 2013). 

Conclusion 

The tridecagon, as a 13-sided shape, is more than a mathematical curiosity—it is a metaphysical, semiotic, cognitive, and aesthetic event. It encapsulates difference, liminality, resistance to conformity, and emergent complexity, making it a rich site for interdisciplinary inquiry. Its metaphysical significance lies in its capacity to disrupt fixed systems and provoke new patterns of thought across disciplines.

 

References (APA Style) 

- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. 

-Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang. 

- Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor Books. 

- Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). Columbia University Press. 

- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

- Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press. 

- Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press. 

- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. 

- Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3–4), 172–198.

- Juniper, A. (2003). Wabi sabi: The Japanese art of impermanence. Tuttle Publishing. 

- Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press. 

- Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Routledge.

- Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press. 

- Levi, E. (1999). Transcendental magic: Its doctrine and ritual. Weiser Books. (Original work published 1854) 

- Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

- Plato. (1997). The Republic (G. M. A. Grube, Trans., C. D. C. Reeve, Rev.). In J. M. Cooper  

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *


* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous


Edited: 
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 



Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Design Futures Part 4: The Archetypal Field


Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

The concept of an "archetypal field" exists, but it is not a scientific term describing a measurable phenomenon. It is an idea most prominently used within Jungian and post-Jungian psychology and related spiritual or philosophical disciplines. Within these contexts, an archetypal field is understood as a dynamic, invisible force or organizing principle that gives rise to the universal patterns known as archetypes. These concepts are not taken as literal scientific fact but as metaphorical frameworks for understanding human experience.

Many thinkers across psychology, philosophy, and esoterica posit something you could call an archetypal field: a non-local, pattern-laden strata of meaning or form that shapes how certain motifs, images, and dynamics repeatedly appear in mind, culture, and nature. It’s not a single settled scientific object; it’s a useful metaphoric and theoretical model for explaining recurring, transpersonal patterns.

* * *

Origins in Carl Jung's work The concept of an archetypal field is an extension of Carl Jung's original ideas: 

The collective unconscious: Jung believed that all humanity shares a universal, inherited reservoir of memories and instincts. 
Archetypes: These are the inherent structural components or "psychic organs" of the collective unconscious. Jung described them as innate predispositions to form certain universal patterns, such as the hero, the mother, or the shadow. 
Psychoid archetypes: Jung later speculated that archetypes might be more than just psychic. He proposed they were "psychoid," or mind-like, and could act as a bridge connecting psychological experience with the physical world (the unus mundus, or "one world"). This idea was influenced by his collaboration with Nobel laureate physicist Wolfgang Pauli. 

* * *

Development in archetypal psychology 
Later, post-Jungian thinkers like James Hillman and Henry Corbin expanded on these ideas within the field of archetypal psychology. 
 • Henry Corbin and the mundus imaginalis: Corbin proposed the mundus imaginalis, a distinct field of "imaginable realities," as the ontological location for the archetypes. In this framework, archetypes are accessed and perceived through imagination. 
• James Hillman and soul-making: Hillman emphasized the "polytheistic" nature of the psyche, viewing archetypes as "fundamental fantasies that animate all life". The idea of the archetypal field is that these numerous mythological figures are active forces that shape our psychological life and are present in a larger field of the psyche. 

* * *

How an "archetypal field" is described In these disciplines, the archetypal field is variously described as: 
• A "field dynamic": An energetic and symbolic realm where archetypes are not just passive roles but "field dynamics" that, when activated, set a pattern in motion. 
• An "epistemic field": A structure that shapes and organizes how we perceive the world and construct meaning. Archetypes act as "lenses of perception" and "organizing structures" for our knowledge. 
• The source of "mood": The archetypal realm is viewed as a source of mood that infuses both personal experience and the broader context of a situation. 
• A transcendental or "divine" realm: Some interpretations see the field as the source of religious and spiritual experiences that emerge from the collective unconscious.
 
* * *

How it might be structured (practical breakdown) 

1. Nodes = archetypal forms 
o Distinct motifs or “forms” (the Mother, the Trickster, the Hero, the Threshold, the Wound, etc.) that function like attractors. 
o Each node has a characteristic gesture (typical images, narratives, feelings, behavioral tendencies). 2. Relations = archetypal grammar 
o Nodes are not isolated: they combine, oppose, transform. Think of a syntax or choreography that governs common sequences (e.g., Call → Initiation → Return). 
3. Topography = intensity & accessibility 
o Some archetypes lie near the surface of cultural awareness (seasonal fertility images), others are deep and shadowy (mortality, annihilation). 
o Topography can be described in terms of gradient strength, activation threshold, and resonance with individual or collective contexts. 
4. Dynamics = excitation, damping, resonance 
o Archetypes “fire” under triggers (rites, crises, dreams, rites of passage). 
o They can amplify one another (resonance) or cancel/transform (interference). 
5. Encoding = symbolic language & affect 
o Archetypes carry both imagery (symbols, myths) and affective tone (awe, dread, longing). Both dimensions are essential to how the field expresses itself. 
6. Scale & fractality 
o Archetypal motifs reappear at multiple scales: individual psychology, family patterns, cultural myth, and ecological cycles — much like fractal self-similarity
7. Medium & transmission 
o The field is expressed through embodied practices (ritual, story, art), social institutions, language, and the unconscious structures of perception. Transmission is cultural, interpersonal, and intrapsychic. 

* * *

Ways to describe it (models & metaphors) 
As a field: borrow physics language — a scalar/vector field of potentials where states of consciousness are local excitations. 
As attractor geometry: in dynamical systems terms, archetypes are attractors in the psychic phase space (stable patterns toward which trajectories converge). 
As morphic resonance: a resonance network where similar forms are more likely to recur because previous instantiations set up a “tendency.” (This is speculative metaphor rather than established physics.) 
As Platonic realm of forms: archetypes as eternal templates that manifest in many particular instantiations. 
As information architecture: patterns of meaning encoded in symbols, myths, and rituals — measurable in cultural redundancy and recurrence. 
As ecological network: nodes (archetypes) embedded in an environment of cultural niches, each favored by different social-ecological conditions. 

* * *

How one might "map" or study an archetypal field 
Phenomenology: collect myths, dreams, folktales; look for invariant motifs and their emotional textures. 
Comparative mythology: map correspondences across cultures and epochs. 
Narrative network analysis: use text analysis to find recurring structures and their statistical relations. 
Clinical observation: track patterns that repeatedly structure patients’ dreams, transference, and life-stories. 
Ritual and performance studies: observe which enactments reliably activate particular archetypal forms. 
Mathematical modeling (speculative): treat archetypes as attractors in state-space and simulate activation thresholds, coupling, and resonance. 

* * *

Functional roles (why positing such a field helps) 
Explains repetition without direct inheritance: why similar myths and symbols recur across unrelated cultures. 
Gives language to collective moods and crises: epidemics of meaning (e.g., mass movements) can be seen as large excitations of certain nodes. 
Provides a heuristic for therapy and art: working with archetypal imagery can reorganize stuck patterns by shifting which attractors dominate. 

Cautions and epistemic status 
The archetypal field is primarily a theoretical and interpretive construct, not a directly measured physical field. 
• Different traditions mean different things by “archetype”: Jungian psychology, mysticism, and speculative biology (e.g., morphic resonance) are not interchangeable.
Use it as a model, not an ontological decree — it’s powerful for pattern recognition but should be handled with empirical humility. 

A short evocative synthesis 
Imagine a low, humming lattice under the surface of culture and mind — a subtle loom where certain patterns are woven repeatedly. When an individual passes through grief, the loom lights a motif called the Mourner; in times of expansion, the Hero or Explorer motif brightens. These motifs are not fixed pictures but dynamic gestures: they bend, clash, blend, and re-emerge across songs, rituals, and dreams. The archetypal field is thus less a place than a grammar a grammar of possibility that shapes what stories can be born, which images find purchase in the heart, and how a culture interprets its wounds and triumphs.

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication. Points of focus to be seriously considered and/or implemented in the design process.

* * *


"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous




Edited: 
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.