Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
Observing and Perceiving
Lower and higher frequencies of energy in motion (EIM) will naturally condense in reference to the context to which they are engaged. These events, appearing as impulses in the form of waves, are always in perpetual flux and forming networks of EIM by means of both attraction and repulsion. When these networks participate in a commonly shared context through mutual attraction, they may then be considered and/or described as a field, system or “domain”.
Every domain contains a self-generated multiplicity of patterns of EIM being exchanged within the parameters of their own collective influence, including associations created between both micro and macro levels of coherence. These concurring events distinguish themselves under the guise of a specific position, i.e. a point of view, where the “context” is perpetually fluctuating between looking in and looking out. This phenomenon is also fundamental in helping describe the concept of duality.
* * *
Quantum Objects’ dual nature mapped with new formula for ‘wave-ness” and “particle-ness” by Stevens Institute of Technology, edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
"Researchers have been working to quantify wave-particle duality for half a century, but this is the first complete framework to fully quantify wave-like and particle-like behaviors with optimum quantitative measures that are relevant at the quantum level."
Previous research showed that wave-ness and particle-ness could be expressed as an inequality, with the sum of an object's wave-like behaviors (such as visible interference patterns) and particle-like behaviors (such as the predictability of its path or location) being equal to or less than one.
To remedy that, the authors introduced a new variable: the coherence of the quantum object.
"Coherence is a tricky concept, but it's essentially a hidden description of the potential for wave-like interference," Qian explains.
"And the conventional measure visibility represents the amount of wave-ness that can be extracted. When we quantify and compensate for coherence, alongside the standard metrics for wave-ness and particle-ness, we find they add up to exactly one."
That enables the calculation of both wave-ness and particle-ness with far more precision. By measuring the coherence in a system, in fact, it becomes possible to calculate a quantum object's level of wave-ness and particle-ness—not simply as "less than one," but as an exact value.
* * *
* * *
Everything can be symbolically arranged within the framework of scale. Scale has both a major and minor affect upon the transition, translation and transformation of EIM. Perception is dependent upon the cognizance (designs) of the observer.
cognizance: cognizance: awareness, notice, knowledge, consciousness, apprehension, perception, realization, recognition, appreciation.
* * *
Quantum internet moves closer as researchers teleport light-based information
by Ingid Fadalli Phys.org, edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
“Quantum teleportation is far from a recent idea, as it was experimentally realized several times in the past. Nonetheless, most previous demonstrations utilized frequency conversion rather than natively operating in the telecom band.
Researchers at Nanjing University recently demonstrated the teleportation of a telecom-wavelength photonic qubit (i.e., a quantum bit encoded in light at the same wavelengths supporting current communications) to a telecom quantum memory. Their paper, published in Physical Review Letters, could open new possibilities for the realization of scalable quantum networks and thus potentially a quantum internet.
The main objective of the recent study by Ma and his colleagues was to successfully integrate a telecom solid-state quantum memory into a quantum teleportation system, which would enable the storage of transmitted quantum information. The main role of this memory would be to spread and store entangled particles across a quantum network (i.e., entanglement distribution).”
* * *
Cosmic, solar, plasmic, atomic, aetheric, mental, emotional and quantum fields describe an assortment of vibratory waves and particles, which are characterizations and descriptions of EIM conjuring up an assortment of perceptions/observations. All forms of light, energy and information interpenetrate each other, mixing and matching into what might be described as kind of "quantum soup". Each vibration adds its' own flavor, which also changes how the soup "tastes" at-large.
All choices and decisions are contingent upon past perceptions and observations and made "in-the-moment" which alone can be described as a "timeless" event.
Lesser density dimensions of light, energy and information vibrate at high frequencies while more "measurable" densities vibrate at lower frequencies. These perceptions/observations become readily apparent when viewed within the parameters of three-dimensional spacetime.
being made each and every moment.
A spectrum embraces a scope of perceptions where any observation may be discovered, maintained or changed. Perception describes the limits within which an observation can be found accountable. We are observers functioning within the constraints of our own specific set and series of macro and micro attractions and repulsions, i.e. perceptions.
When responding to a certain context some POV join together referencing a shared resonance and/or pattern. Others can be repelled when observing the same situation. Every circumstance triggers a set of responses or series of "feelings", of which some will dominate while others remain unaligned
Separation creates categorization. Separation prompts and triggers the urge to re-discover and re-unite through the power of balance and harmony (design). We live in a universe where change is openly displayed as an endless process of motion always filling and emptying.
What is of most importance is the action of pouring and exchange which in fact refers to the design process during the transition, translation and transformation of EIM.
States of Energy, Light and Information
EIM takes on an "identity" when viewed, i.e. observed/perceived, within the parameters of a particular framework that symbolically describes a specific and therefore identifiable, "state of energy". Likened to a photograph where an event and/or experience appears to become frozen in space and time, actually each image/impression harbors an identifiable blueprint at the time of its' resurrection - along with a timeless and emotional impact upon observation.
* * *
A cat is a cat and can only function, respond, observe and participate within the context of 3D spacetime as a cat. Every cat displays its' differences through a wide variety of symbolic characteristics. Certain perspectives (traits) identify the cat, while others identify the cat in reference to certain and different circumstances.
The Design Paradox
An observer can only respond to what is perceived and perception can only respond what is observed. To perceive is to vibrationally resonate to what is being observed and vice versa. The concept of synchronicity is experienced and “felt” when both micro (subjective) and macro (objective) vibrations resonate within a common held framework of dimensional space and linear time. This is why certain synchronicities can often be deemed as being timeless.
Timelessness is a synchronistic playground.
The ability to resonate and make connections between obscure circumstances is dependent upon the impartiality and receptivity of the observer.
* * *
Observing and Perceiving: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of Energy, Cognition, and Symbolic Design
The dynamics of energy in motion (EIM) can be understood as a continuously unfolding field of fluctuating frequencies, where the interactions of lower and higher vibratory states give rise to perceptual and material phenomena. These interactions, forming through attraction and repulsion, organize themselves into relational structures that constitute fields, systems, or domains—terms that refer to contextualized groupings of energy patterns sharing coherent informational or energetic signatures.
From the lens of quantum physics, this mirrors the concept of entanglement and coherence, where systems are defined not solely by their components but by their relational potentials (Bohm, 1980). As quantum fields fluctuate, they manifest probabilistically into observable states only through interaction with an observer, reinforcing the premise that perception is participatory rather than passive (Barad, 2007). This aligns closely with metaphysical propositions that describe reality as fundamentally relational and processual, where being is always becoming within a field of potentialities (Whitehead, 1929/1978).
Domains of energetic interaction exist as nested scales—from the cosmic and aetheric to the emotional and mental—each vibrating at differing frequencies and densities. These patterns of resonance generate symbolic structure, governed by the semiotic code inherent to scale and perception. As semiotics teaches us, signs do not exist in isolation; rather, their meaning emerges through systemic relations, much like energy patterns within a field (Eco, 1976; Peirce, 1931–1958). The domain, then, can be interpreted as a semiotic system where energy, form, and perception co-arise in a dynamic interplay.
Perception itself is not merely a passive reception of stimuli but an active design of awareness—a cognitive and symbolic construction that mediates between the observer and the observed. This resonates with psychological insights from Gestalt theory, which emphasizes that perception organizes itself according to holistic patterns (Wertheimer, 1923), and with design theory, which posits that cognition and perception are structured through frames—contexts of meaning that shape both the process and outcome of observation (Dorst, 2015).
The recursive nature of observation and perception is central to what might be termed the design paradox: one can only observe what one is able to perceive, and one can only perceive what one is predisposed to observe. This co-arising relation suggests a vibrational attunement between observer and environment, akin to what Jung (1960) described as synchronicity—an acausal connecting principle that binds internal states with external events when both operate at harmonized frequencies. In this sense, timelessness represents not an absence of time but a state in which vibratory alignment transcends linear temporality, enabling access to a multidimensional spectrum of meaning.
Furthermore, scale—as determined by frequency, magnitude, and dimensionality—acts as both an ontological and epistemological constraint. It influences how energy condenses into form, how perception is structured, and how symbolic meaning is assigned. The semiotic interpretation of such scale suggests that each domain or dimensional context is a "language" through which energy expresses and experiences itself. The observer, by means of cognizance, becomes both decoder and designer within this symbolic matrix.
A spectrum, in this context, becomes not merely a range of frequencies but a matrix of constraints and possibilities, delimiting the aperture of perception through which reality can be accessed. Every act of observation is therefore an act of participatory design—a process of matching one's vibratory potential with that of the observed. As such, reality is not discovered but co-created, with cognition serving as the lens through which energy, symbol, and experience converge.
Conclusion
This framework challenges the dichotomy of subject and object by emphasizing the relational, vibrational, and semiotic foundations of both perception and reality. In uniting metaphysical principles with insights from quantum physics, semiotics, psychology, and design theory, we arrive at a view of existence as a system of reciprocal emergence, where meaning, matter, and mind are entangled through the ongoing dynamics of energetic perception.
APA References
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
- Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. MIT Press.
- Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
- Jung, C. G. (1960). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
- Wertheimer, M. (1923). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In Ellis, W. D. (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (1938, pp. 71–88). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed., D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, Eds.). Free Press. (Original work published 1929)
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited: 07.25.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.
