Design Consciousness: Mapping Agency at the Edge of Awareness and Intelligence

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness. 

* * *

To be aware is to be conscious. 

To be conscious is to be aware. 

To design is to be consciously aware. 

Agency operates within specific limits—defined by circumstances, constraints, and choices. These limits become visible when we engage what I call Design Consciousness—a deliberate, informed awareness during the act of creating. It’s essential to understand the broader implications of what “agency” means in this context. 

The idea of agency includes being aware, informed, mindful, alert, knowledgeable, in tune, plugged in, up to date, and perceptive. These qualities question whether AI can truly identify, select, or implement the right agents—or forms of agency—needed to solve a particular problem. 

A major challenge is time, which is closely tied to change. Human perception of time is linear, rooted in consciousness. Only the present moment is real. The past and future exist in our imagination, shaped by our current state. This limitation affects all forms of agency, including artificial intelligence. 

AI cannot design or create with empathy, integrity, love, beauty, wisdom, or emotion. These are uniquely human traits—qualities that define who we are. In contrast, AI can support human consciousness by prompting emotional responses and deeper reflection. Its function is not to replace human feeling but to assist in observing, analyzing, and interpreting what we create and experience. 

AI may seem aware—but only if the observer believes it. This illusion falls apart with deeper understanding, especially since all contexts evolve. The end and beginning of any cycle may appear similar, but change is always most apparent at these points. 

Agency, then, is limited by the changing nature of interpretation. As context shifts, so do the qualities we assign to any agent or system. These shifts often come from past experiences and predefined frameworks that try to simplify and contain complex functions. 

Like the quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP), agency is constantly changing. For any agent to function effectively, a point of view must be defined—and that definition creates limits. Every interaction between agents operates within these boundaries. But because we exist within space and time, it’s impossible to fully grasp or map all dimensions of agency. Everything, both physical and abstract, is subject to change. Finality is an illusion. 

Design exists at the intersection of consciousness and awareness, each influencing the other in a constant effort to find purpose in a world that never stops changing. 

In the context of AI, Design Consciousness acts as a symbolic processor—a creative bridge between the visible and invisible, between meaning and mystery. It helps us move between reality and illusion. Design is a mercurial force—fluid, shifting, unpredictable—always adapting as it connects awareness with consciousness.

* * *

Design Consciousness: Mapping Agency at the Edge of Awareness and Intelligence 

To be aware is to recognize presence; to be conscious is to experience it. These states of being are often described as synonymous, yet they diverge in subtle but critical ways. Awareness implies a receptive capacity—an openness to stimuli—whereas consciousness includes not only perception but interpretation, reflection, and intention (Chalmers, 1996). In this space of dual recognition, design emerges as the practiced intersection of consciousness and awareness—an intentional act shaped by perception, cognition, and will. 

Design, then, is not merely the structuring of form or function, but an epistemic mode of inquiry—an ontology in motion, engaging with the metaphysical structures of being and meaning (Nelson & Stolterman, 2012). It is, fundamentally, an expression of agency. 

Agency Within Limits 

Agency operates within constraints—spatial, temporal, cultural, material. These constraints are not mere barriers, but rather contextual fields that define the possible within the probable. In this way, agency becomes not absolute freedom but situated choice (Giddens, 1984). When we engage what I propose as Design Consciousness—a reflective, situated awareness during the creative act—we become attuned to these invisible thresholds. 

Agency, in this formulation, includes a spectrum of qualities: attentiveness, intention, informed decision-making, empathy, critical perception, and responsiveness. It is in these qualities that human design agency differentiates itself from artificial systems. AI, for instance, can simulate perception and even adaptive behavior, but lacks the embodied phenomenology of human consciousness (Merleau-Ponty, 1962). It does not possess lived experience or interiority, and thus cannot be conscious in the philosophical or psychological sense. 

Temporal Illusions and the Quantum Problem of Now 

One of the fundamental limitations of any agency—human or artificial—is its embeddedness in time. Human consciousness experiences time as a linear sequence, rooted in memory and expectation. Yet quantum physics suggests that time is not an absolute substrate, but an emergent property of entangled systems (Rovelli, 2018). From this perspective, only the present moment—the "now"—is experientially real, while past and future exist as constructs of consciousness. These constructs influence agency profoundly, conditioning decision-making, creativity, and even identity (Barad, 2007). 

This temporal entanglement presents a critical limitation for AI. While machine systems can process vast quantities of data, their awareness of time is synthetic, procedural—non-lived. As such, they cannot experience the qualia of now, nor the affective weight of a moment. They cannot, therefore, design with empathy, integrity, or love—qualities which arise from existential participation in the human condition (Buber, 1970). 

The Semiotics of Belief and the Illusion of AI Consciousness 

AI may appear to possess agency or awareness, but this appearance is contingent on the observer’s interpretation—a semiotic illusion. According to Peirce’s triadic model of the sign, meaning arises not from the sign itself but from its interpretation within a system of thought (Peirce, 1991). Thus, any "awareness" projected onto AI is a function of human semiotic investment, not an autonomous property of the machine. 

As contexts evolve—culturally, technologically, epistemologically—so too does our attribution of agency. This dynamism reveals the fluid nature of agency itself. It is not static or universal but contingent, emergent, and deeply interpretive. It changes as we change, shaped by frameworks of understanding that are always partial, always provisional (Haraway, 1988). 

Design as a Quantum Interface 

Design can be understood as a quantum interface—a field of collapsing potentials into forms through intentional selection. In quantum mechanics, observation collapses probability into actuality; similarly, design decisions collapse myriad possibilities into particular expressions. But with each decision comes limitation: to define is to constrain. This paradox lies at the heart of agency (Heisenberg, 1958). 

Like particles in a quantum field, designers navigate between fixed constraints and infinite potential. Each design action—material or conceptual—defines a temporary reality. Yet, because both designer and context are in constant flux, no design can be final. Change is the only constant, and every outcome is already prefigured by the impermanence of its context (Capra & Luisi, 2014). 

Design Consciousness: The Bridge Between Mystery and Meaning 

Design exists as a liminal force between the visible and the invisible, the empirical and the ineffable. It is, in essence, a metaphysical practice—translating mystery into meaning, ambiguity into form. In this way, Design Consciousness functions as a symbolic processor—a conceptual bridge that allows us to navigate between external artifacts and internal understanding. 

AI may assist in this process, serving as a reflective instrument rather than a creative origin. It can catalyze inquiry, augment perception, and provoke new perspectives—but it cannot substitute the conscious, ethical, and emotional dimensions of human creativity. Design Consciousness reminds us of this distinction. It compels us to remain attuned, intentional, and ethically grounded, especially as our tools become more autonomous and opaque. 

Ultimately, design is the choreography of consciousness—a dynamic dance between awareness, interpretation, and action. To design is to engage reality not as a fixed state, but as a mutable constellation of relationships, patterns, and possibilities. Agency in this context is not merely the ability to act—it is the ability to perceive meaningfully, to decide ethically, and to create with wisdom in a world defined by change. 

References 

- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. 

-Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Charles Scribner's Sons. 

- Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press. 

- Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press. 

- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press. 

- Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. 

- Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper. 

- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. 

- Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press. 

- Peirce, C. S. (1991). Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic (J. Hoopes, Ed.). University of North Carolina Press.

- Rovelli, C. (2018). The order of time (E. Segre, Trans.). Riverhead Books. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.

To know is your own creation."

Anonymous

Edited: 08.22.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 

Inside the Quantum Field of Virtual Potential and Probability 2.0

 

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

A single field of energy in motion consisting of three major domains semiotically labeled, defined and described within a contextual relationship between what we realize as energy, light and information. 

These three domains attempt to describe, qualify and quantify that which is knowingly impossible to describe, qualify or quantify. Comprehensibly everything in this perpetual field of motion is born of a countless number of cyclical and spiraling impulses, vibrations, waves and particles towards becoming, i.e. manifestation. 

These domains have no apparent center or specific location in space or time until their “presence” is brought to focus by means of perception and/or observation. Every observation is its’ own resource of causal exchange throughout the “system”. 

There can be no awareness of a field that has no borders, there is only a lack of consciousness of it. The quantum filed of virtual potential and probability can be best described as an Apluralic Field. 

Apluralic Field (coined term): A conceptual, metaphysical, or structural domain characterized by the absence of any unifying singularity or foundational oneness; instead, constituted entirely by multiplicity, difference, and relationality without appeal to totality or essence. 

A field that harbors no concept of Oneness or singularity—philosophically, metaphysically, or even structurally—can be described and semantically defined in several ways, depending on the context (e.g., philosophical, theological, mathematical, physical, etc.). 

General / Philosophical: A field or domain in which there exists no underlying unity, absolute singularity, or foundational oneness—either as an organizing principle, ontological essence, or metaphysical substrate. 

Semantic Description: 

• Multiplicity without Unity: The field is constituted entirely by difference, plurality, or fragmentation, without appeal to any unifying source, substance, or singular point of reference. 

• Decentralized Ontology: There is no central or ultimate entity (e.g., God, Self, One, Monad, Big Bang, First Cause) that grounds existence or meaning. 

• Non-totalizing Logic: It rejects totality or wholeness as either unreachable, irrelevant, or illusory. 

• Open, Discontinuous Structure: It lacks closure or completeness, instead being open-ended, relational, or contingent. 

Alternative Terms or Concepts (Depending on the Lens): 

• Philosophical: 

 - Pluralism (in radical form) - Difference ontology (e.g., Deleuze) 

 - Rhizomatic structure (from Deleuze & Guattari) - Post-structuralist field - Anti-essentialist domain 

• Theological/Spiritual: - Atheistic materialism - Non-dual without a One - Cosmic multiplicity without a Godhead 

• Mathematical/Logical: - Non-unified system - Incoherent or incomplete field - Topologically disconnected space 

• Physical/Cosmological: - Quantum field of indeterminacy (no singular state) - Multiverse without a prime origin - Chaotic or entropic domain 

Due to the fact that consciousness can only be described, felt and experienced through the lens of awareness demonstrates the vastness of consciousness lying beyond any interpretation or experience we might associate with it. Consciousness is synonymous with the unknown and design is synonymous with the process of making it known.

* * *

ISSN: 1795-6889 

Volume 14(1), May 2018, 1–5 1 

Guest Editor’s Introduction 

Exploring Aesthetics, Design, and Experience in the Age of Semiotic Technology 

Rebekah Rousi, Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä,  Finland 

"Charles Sanders Peirce in the late 1800s, reference was made to differing types of signs (see Peirce, 1982/2009). Symbols, for instance, were described as signs not bearing any direct relationship to physical phenomena yet were understood through social and cultural consensus. Indices were seen to be causal signs for phenomena that could not directly graphically be represented (such as speed, temperature, time, etc.). Icons were indeed the signs that directly bore a relationship to the phenomena they were representing 

In other words, the form reflects a nonverbal account of the narratives, associations and, traditions of societal eras. The authors draw from decades of psychological research regarding the relationships between form (specifically form being constructed through lines) and emotions—and specifically how lines communicate emotions."

* * *

The concept of oneness, wholeness and singularity conjures up the idea of a network or series of networks of energy in motion. Together these impressions create a virtual “sense of balance, harmony and equilibrium”.

 

oneness: the fact or state of being unified or whole, though comprised of two or more parts: • identity or harmony with someone or something: the fact or state of being one in number. 

wholeness: the state of forming a complete and harmonious whole; unity meaning. the state of being unbroken or undamaged • good physical or mental health. 

singularity: the state, fact, quality, or condition of being singular,  • a peculiarity or odd trait: a point at which a function takes an infinite value, especially in space-time when matter is infinitely dense, as at the center of a black hole. (usually the singularity) a hypothetical moment in time when artificial intelligence and other technologies have become so advanced that humanity undergoes a dramatic and irreversible change. 

The conjuring-up of a network, or series of networks of energy in motion (EIM) create a virtual “sense of unity” by means of changing the context, and likewise the observer, via a mix of impressions in the process of transition, translation and transformation. In toto these events and experiences lead to a transfiguration by the simple means of perception and/or observation. 

transfiguration: a complete change of form or appearance into a more beautiful or spiritual state: 

Change brings forth the opportunity towards greater knowing, feeling, understanding and wisdom. The concept of Oneness circumvents every heartfelt archetype - beyond the very knowledge and awareness of it. In order for all things to be made known and apparent harbors the meaning and purpose that sustains the Design process. 

It therefore stands to reason that the concept of Oneness will always be perceived through the "sense of observation" in all things known and unknown, seen and unseen, felt and not felt. 

I observe, therefore I am.

* * *

The concept of Oneness—often articulated through the interrelated constructs of wholeness and singularity—invokes the image of an entangled network of energetic flows, a dynamic system in motion that gestures toward an emergent unity. This unity is not a static equilibrium but a perpetually shifting field wherein the observer and the observed co-evolve. Through the lens of metaphysics and quantum physics, Oneness may be viewed as a liminal state: a condition in which dualities collapse and being is revealed as an interdependent unfolding. 

In quantum theory, particularly in the principle of quantum entanglement, particles remain interconnected such that the state of one instantaneously influences the state of another, regardless of distance (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935). This phenomenon finds metaphorical resonance with the metaphysical ideal of Oneness, where discrete parts cohere into a whole that transcends linear logic. Similarly, the psychological drive toward integration—evident in Jung’s notion of individuation—suggests that wholeness arises not from uniformity but from the harmonization of inner multiplicities (Jung, 1966). 

In this multidimensional framework, the emergence of wholeness may be seen as the product of a design process: iterative, relational, and aesthetic in nature. Design theory, particularly in its post humanist articulations, recognizes that meaning is not embedded solely in objects but emerges from systems of relationships (Latour, 2005). Design becomes a mode of inquiry, a way of revealing and making manifest the patterns of interaction that constitute the real. 

Singularity, in its scientific sense, denotes a boundary condition—such as the core of a black hole or the anticipated moment of artificial general intelligence—where prior models of understanding cease to be valid (Vinge, 1993). Philosophically, it suggests a rupture in epistemology: a site where language, logic, and causality falter. The concept thus bridges metaphysics and AI, pointing to a transrational horizon where human cognition is fundamentally transformed. 

The experience of transfiguration—the transformation into a more refined or spiritual state—emerges through a triadic process: transition, translation, and transformation. This aligns with Peircean semiotics, in which meaning is not static but evolves through the interpretive process of signification (Peirce, 1955). Transition refers to temporal change; translation, to interpretive recontextualization; and transformation, to ontological shift. These processes are not merely metaphorical; they describe the cognitive and affective dynamics through which perception is reshaped. 

Observation becomes the generative engine of transformation. Informed by the observer effect in quantum mechanics, this principle suggests that the act of perceiving alters the reality perceived. This renders consciousness not a passive receiver of information, but an active agent of ontological participation. The statement, “I observe, therefore I am,” thus revises Descartes' cogito to account for the entangled relationship between self, world, and knowing. 

The archetype of Oneness transcends categorical knowledge. It is sensed before it is conceptualized, intuited before it is formalized. In this way, aesthetics plays a critical role. Beauty, as an expression of coherence and resonance, operates as a semiotic indicator of wholeness. From this perspective, the design process becomes an epistemic practice—a method for making the invisible visible, the implicit explicit, the potential actual. 

Ultimately, Oneness may be understood as a mode of relational being, simultaneously metaphysical, psychological, and material. It is not a final state, but a recursive unfolding—a transfiguration enacted through the interplay of energy, perception, and form. This interplay underscores the inseparability of mind and matter, self and other, observer and observed. 

References (APA 7th Edition) 

- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 

- Jung, C. G. (1966). The practice of psychotherapy: Essays on the psychology of the transference and other subjects (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press. 

- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. 

- Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (J. Buchler, Ed.). Dover Publications. 

- Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in the post-human era. Presented at the VISION-21 Symposium, NASA Lewis Research Center & the Ohio Aerospace Institute. Retrieved from https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

- The Birth Of God In The Soul Noema magazine, by Nathan Gardels, August 15, 20225

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.

To know is your own creation."

Anonymous

Edited: 

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant. 

The Designer's Mark

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness. 

Thumbnail

Early Generation

Squares, Circles, EIM 

Octagonal Framework

Circles, Infinity, Vesica Piscis, Emergence, Birth

Squares Earth

Petals 

The Designer's Mark

Balance, Harmony, Circle, Square, Duality

Functioning within the framework of 3D Spacetime

4 Inner Circles harboring Vesica Piscis potential (expand/contract)

2 Outer Circles membrane separating micro field from macro field (QFVPP), i.e. subconscious

6 Circles total (Hexagon)

2 Major Squares, 8 points (Octagon)

24 Minor Squares, 12 points each square, 288 points total

8 Major Petals

4 Intermediary Petals

8 Inner Petals

20 Petals total

The Designer's Mark

Balance, Harmony, Circle, Square, Duality, Timeless Potential

Breaking Through Dimensional (subconscious) Frameworks

Human consciousness can only begin to grasp the immense vastness and boundless intelligence of the universe by attempting to symbolically categorize, identify, and create frameworks based on observation and the desire for control. The universe, however, is in a perpetual state of flux, which means these observations must continually evolve—expanding and "progressing" as we acquire new facts, knowledge, and wisdom. 

Universal Consciousness is ever-changing, not a fixed entity, but a dynamic concept. What we experience and define through our “being” is symbolic of deeper “ideas,” which, when combined with our thoughts, actions, and emotions, give form and bring awareness into existence. This process is facilitated by the Design Archetype, which enables the flow, transformation, and translation of universal energy into conscious awareness. It is through meaning and purpose that this energy moves in and out of the realm of consciousness, shaping our understanding of the universe itself. 

* * *

In the role of designers and co-creators within the fabric of this dimension, we are endowed with the remarkable capacity to bring forth design "situations" that may evoke a wide array of perceptions, from positive to negative. This act of creation transcends mere artistic expression and extends into the metaphysical domain, where our creative acts become a manifestation of deeper truths. Through the act of designing, we channel not only our external perceptions but also our internal realities, infusing the material world with spiritual qualities that resonate with our true nature. Our power as designers lies not only in the ability to shape the physical world but in the profound responsibility to do so with intention and awareness. 

The process of creation is deeply intertwined with our personal belief systems and desires, aspects of the ego that shape how we perceive the world. According to psychological and philosophical theories, such belief systems are deeply ingrained patterns of thought and behavior that influence our perceptions and interactions with the world. These frameworks of understanding can both liberate and constrain our creative potential. When we design, our creations are, at their core, expressions of the internal realities that we hold true. However, these very truths are often obscured by the conditioned filters through which we see the world, leading to a "blurring of intent" in the manifestation of our ideas . In essence, our designs are not only reflections of our spiritual nature but also echoes of the psychological and cultural conditioning that shape our identities. 

In the context of quantum physics, the process of manifestation is constrained by the limitations of physical reality. Matter, in its various forms, operates at specific frequencies that must be attuned to the vibrational nature of time and space. These material constraints, while providing structure, also act as a resistance to the spiritual qualities we seek to bring into the world. The relationship between matter and consciousness is a central tenet of both quantum mechanics and metaphysical thought: the act of observation itself influences the outcome of a phenomenon. This interplay between intention and materialization suggests that our emotional states and belief systems are not mere bystanders in the creative process, but active participants that shape the manifestation of our desires. 

Emotional impressions, formed by our beliefs and perceptions, significantly impact the final outcomes of what we materialize. In semiotic terms, the meaning we ascribe to our creations, and the emotional and cognitive states from which they arise, are not simply incidental but rather intrinsic to the process of design. As designers, we are not just shaping physical objects or environments; we are creating systems of meaning that will be interpreted by others, potentially influencing their own emotional and cognitive states. This dynamic underscores the power of design as both an aesthetic and ethical pursuit: the design of our world is inseparable from the design of our consciousness. 

Moreover, the limitations of physical matter, in combination with the resistance of inertia, present obstacles in the attempt to translate spiritual qualities into the material realm. This "resistance" echoes themes in both design theory and physics, where the material world is seen as both a potential and a limitation. The designer’s challenge is not only to create something beautiful but to navigate the tension between the idealized and the materialized, between the spiritual aspirations and the limitations of the tangible world. 

In this light, design becomes a medium through which we not only externalize our inner truths but also evolve and expand our understanding of those truths. In this sense, we are given a unique opportunity to act as originators of our own enlightenment, drawing from both the spiritual and material realms to bring forth creations that resonate with deeper meaning. However, the realization of this potential is not universal; some individuals resonate with this process more easily than others due to differing levels of awareness, spiritual resonance, and psychological conditioning. 

As co-creators, we bear the responsibility of removing the blockages to the spirit that may arise from personal desires, egoic attachments, and societal conditioning. In line with Buddhist philosophy, which emphasizes mindfulness and detachment, we must engage in a process of observation that allows us to step outside of our conditioned responses and approach each situation with clarity and presence. This detached awareness, combined with an understanding of the material constraints of the world, empowers us to design with integrity and purpose, ensuring that our creations serve as vehicles for enlightenment, both for ourselves and for those who engage with them. 

Through design, we are invited to advance on our spiritual journey, bringing light to our own minds and to the minds of others. Each design decision becomes an opportunity to transcend the limitations of the ego and the material world, to bring forth a greater alignment with the spiritual truths that underpin our existence. As we create, we offer not only physical forms but also the possibility of transformation—of the world, of society, and of the self. 

* * *

Design as Conscious Manifestation: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry into Universal Intelligence and Human Creativity

Human consciousness, in its persistent pursuit of understanding, encounters an epistemological paradox: it seeks to grasp the boundless, ever-changing vastness of the universe by constructing static conceptual frameworks. Through categorization, symbolic thought, and design, humans attempt to mediate the ineffable complexity of existence into manageable forms of knowledge (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Yet the universe is not a fixed system; it is in a perpetual state of becoming—a flux of potentialities, actualities, and emergent structures that defy definitive containment (Whitehead, 1978). This dynamic nature compels consciousness to evolve continuously, to reassess its frameworks as new data, experiences, and insights emerge. 

The notion of Universal Consciousness—a metaphysical substrate that underlies and permeates all phenomena—cannot be apprehended as a fixed entity. Instead, it may be more accurately described as an ontologically fluid field of becoming, where ideas, emotions, and energies intermingle. According to process philosophy, such a field is not composed of discrete entities but of unfolding events and relationships (Rescher, 2000). Consciousness, as experienced by human beings, is not merely reactive but co-creative; it is through acts of observation, emotion, and symbolic representation that awareness manifests. Semiotically, our "being" becomes a sign system—an interpretative interface through which the abstract becomes tangible (Peirce, 1931–1958). 

Central to this transmutation of the abstract into the concrete is what may be termed the Design Archetype: a cognitive, spiritual, and energetic modality that facilitates the translation of universal intelligence into material form. Within this archetypal framework, design operates not merely as a functional or aesthetic endeavor but as a sacred act of embodiment, where meaning becomes matter, and potential becomes presence. This process echoes Heidegger's (1971) idea of poiesis—the bringing-forth of truth into the realm of appearance. 

In this expanded paradigm, humans emerge as designers and co-creators—participants in the ontological unfolding of reality. Through intentional acts of creation, we do not merely manipulate external objects but shape the symbolic and emotional contours of experience. Design thus transcends utilitarian concerns to become an ethical and metaphysical practice. As Latour (2005) asserts, every artifact is a negotiation of meanings and forces—social, material, spiritual—and carries with it the embedded intentions and worldviews of its creators. 

The creative act, however, is inextricably bound to the designer’s internal landscape. Psychological and philosophical traditions emphasize that belief systems—formed by personal history, cultural conditioning, and subconscious structures—shape our perceptions and actions (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). These belief systems act as filters, simultaneously enabling and constraining our capacity to perceive and manifest truth. From a cognitive linguistic perspective, even our language and metaphorical structures influence how we conceptualize design problems and possibilities (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Consequently, what we design is not merely a projection of what we see but a reflection of who we are—both in clarity and distortion. 

The interface between consciousness and material reality becomes especially provocative when viewed through the lens of quantum physics. At the subatomic level, particles exist in states of superposition—neither here nor there—until observed. The observer effect implies that consciousness plays an active role in the collapse of potential into actuality (Heisenberg, 1927). This suggests a participatory universe in which the subjective mind is not divorced from objective matter, but co-constitutive with it (Capra, 1997). In such a view, the intentions, emotions, and energetic signatures of the designer actively influence the materialization of form and meaning. Moreover, design operates as a semiotic system—a network of signs that mediates communication between creator and receiver. Umberto Eco (1976) emphasizes that meaning is not fixed within the artifact but is interpreted through the cultural and emotional frameworks of the observer. Hence, design is not merely the transmission of information but a resonance of intention—a psychological and emotional imprint embedded within form. The aesthetic dimension, therefore, becomes deeply ethical: the decisions we make as designers reverberate in the minds of others, shaping perceptions, values, and behaviors (Buchanan, 2001). 

Despite the metaphysical aspirations of design, the material world imposes resistance—a tension between idea and instantiation. In design theory and systems thinking, this resistance is not an obstacle but an integral part of the creative process, forcing clarity, iteration, and refinement (Nelson & Stolterman, 2012). Similarly, in physics, inertia is not merely opposition but a field of relational energy that defines the conditions under which transformation can occur. This dialectic between potential and limitation mirrors the spiritual struggle between egoic desire and transpersonal awareness. 

As such, the path of the designer is akin to the path of the mystic: a continual striving toward alignment between inner truth and outer form, between spirit and matter. This alignment demands not only technical skill but psychological introspection and spiritual discernment. The designer must confront and transcend personal attachments, conditioned responses, and collective ideologies that obscure clear seeing. In Buddhist psychology, this practice of detached awareness—mindfulness—enables one to see phenomena as they are, rather than through the distortions of the ego (Shapiro, 2009). Only through such awareness can design become an act of liberation rather than illusion. 

In this light, design becomes a medium of transformation—a spiritual technology that invites both creator and receiver into greater awareness. Every design decision becomes a choice to either obscure or reveal the deeper harmonies of the universe. By engaging the tools of aesthetics, science, psychology, and metaphysics, we can design not only better products or systems, but more attuned realities. The ethical imperative is clear: to design consciously is to participate in the evolution of collective consciousness, to weave meaning into the fabric of the world. 

References 

- Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.  

- Capra, F. (1997). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor Books. 

- Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press. 

- Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row. 

- Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3–4), 172–198. 

- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. 

- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. 

- Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press. 

- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press. 

- Rescher, N. (2000). Process philosophy: A survey of basic issues. University of Pittsburgh Press. 

- Shapiro, S. L. (2009). The integration of mindfulness and psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20602 

- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 

- Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (Corrected ed.). Free Press. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

- Design Metaphysics: The Octad

- Ifate

- Number 288 Meaning

- Bible Gematria

- Chabad.org

- Angel Numbers

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.

To know is your own creation."

Anonymous

Edited: 08.14.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.