Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
A single field of energy in motion consisting of three major domains semiotically labeled, defined and described within a contextual relationship between what we realize as energy, light and information.
These three domains attempt to describe, qualify and quantify that which is knowingly impossible to describe, qualify or quantify. Comprehensibly everything in this perpetual field of motion is born of a countless number of cyclical and spiraling impulses, vibrations, waves and particles towards becoming, i.e. manifestation.
These domains have no apparent center or specific location in space or time until their “presence” is brought to focus by means of perception and/or observation. Every observation is its’ own resource of causal exchange throughout the “system”.
There can be no awareness of a field that has no borders, there is only a lack of consciousness of it. The quantum filed of virtual potential and probability can be best described as an Apluralic Field.
Apluralic Field (coined term):
A conceptual, metaphysical, or structural domain characterized by the absence of any unifying singularity or foundational oneness; instead, constituted entirely by multiplicity, difference, and relationality without appeal to totality or essence.
A field that harbors no concept of Oneness or singularity—philosophically, metaphysically, or even structurally—can be described and semantically defined in several ways, depending on the context (e.g., philosophical, theological, mathematical, physical, etc.).
General / Philosophical: A field or domain in which there exists no underlying unity, absolute singularity, or foundational oneness—either as an organizing principle, ontological essence, or metaphysical substrate.
Semantic Description:
• Multiplicity without Unity: The field is constituted entirely by difference, plurality, or fragmentation, without appeal to any unifying source, substance, or singular point of reference.
• Decentralized Ontology: There is no central or ultimate entity (e.g., God, Self, One, Monad, Big Bang, First Cause) that grounds existence or meaning.
• Non-totalizing Logic: It rejects totality or wholeness as either unreachable, irrelevant, or illusory.
• Open, Discontinuous Structure: It lacks closure or completeness, instead being open-ended, relational, or contingent.
Alternative Terms or Concepts (Depending on the Lens):
• Philosophical:
- Pluralism (in radical form) - Difference ontology (e.g., Deleuze)
- Rhizomatic structure (from Deleuze & Guattari) - Post-structuralist field - Anti-essentialist domain
• Theological/Spiritual: - Atheistic materialism - Non-dual without a One - Cosmic multiplicity without a Godhead
• Mathematical/Logical: - Non-unified system - Incoherent or incomplete field - Topologically disconnected space
• Physical/Cosmological: - Quantum field of indeterminacy (no singular state) - Multiverse without a prime origin - Chaotic or entropic domain
Due to the fact that consciousness can only be described, felt and experienced through the lens of awareness demonstrates the vastness of consciousness lying beyond any interpretation or experience we might associate with it. Consciousness is synonymous with the unknown and design is synonymous with the process of making it known.
* * *
ISSN: 1795-6889
Volume 14(1), May 2018, 1–5
1
Guest Editor’s Introduction
Rebekah Rousi, Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
"Charles Sanders Peirce in the late 1800s, reference was made to differing types of signs (see Peirce, 1982/2009). Symbols, for instance, were described as signs not bearing any direct relationship to physical phenomena yet were understood through social and cultural consensus. Indices were seen to be causal signs for phenomena that could not directly graphically be represented (such as speed,
temperature, time, etc.). Icons were indeed the signs that directly bore a relationship to the phenomena they were representing
In other words, the form reflects a nonverbal account of the narratives, associations and, traditions of societal eras. The authors draw from decades of psychological research regarding the relationships between form (specifically form being constructed through lines) and emotions—and specifically how lines communicate emotions."
* * *
The concept of oneness, wholeness and singularity conjures up the idea of a network or series of networks of energy in motion. Together these impressions create a virtual “sense of balance, harmony and equilibrium”.
oneness: the fact or state of being unified or whole, though comprised of two or more parts: • identity or harmony with someone or something: the fact or state of being one in number.
wholeness: the state of forming a complete and harmonious whole; unity meaning. the state of being unbroken or undamaged • good physical or mental health.
singularity: the state, fact, quality, or condition of being singular, • a peculiarity or odd trait: a point at which a function takes an infinite value, especially in space-time when matter is infinitely dense, as at the center of a black hole. (usually the singularity) a hypothetical moment in time when artificial intelligence and other technologies have become so advanced that humanity undergoes a dramatic and irreversible change.
The conjuring-up of a network, or series of networks of energy in motion (EIM) create a virtual “sense of unity” by means of changing the context, and likewise the observer, via a mix of impressions in the process of transition, translation and transformation. In toto these events and experiences lead to a transfiguration by the simple means of perception and/or observation.
transfiguration: a complete change of form or appearance into a more beautiful or spiritual state:
Change brings forth the opportunity towards greater knowing, feeling, understanding and wisdom. The concept of Oneness circumvents every heartfelt archetype - beyond the very knowledge and awareness of it. In order for all things to be made known and apparent harbors the meaning and purpose that sustains the Design process.
It therefore stands to reason that the concept of Oneness will always be perceived through the "sense of observation" in all things known and unknown, seen and unseen, felt and not felt.
I observe, therefore I am.
* * *
The concept of Oneness—often articulated through the interrelated constructs of wholeness and singularity—invokes the image of an entangled network of energetic flows, a dynamic system in motion that gestures toward an emergent unity. This unity is not a static equilibrium but a perpetually shifting field wherein the observer and the observed co-evolve. Through the lens of metaphysics and quantum physics, Oneness may be viewed as a liminal state: a condition in which dualities collapse and being is revealed as an interdependent unfolding.
In quantum theory, particularly in the principle of quantum entanglement, particles remain interconnected such that the state of one instantaneously influences the state of another, regardless of distance (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935). This phenomenon finds metaphorical resonance with the metaphysical ideal of Oneness, where discrete parts cohere into a whole that transcends linear logic. Similarly, the psychological drive toward integration—evident in Jung’s notion of individuation—suggests that wholeness arises not from uniformity but from the harmonization of inner multiplicities (Jung, 1966).
In this multidimensional framework, the emergence of wholeness may be seen as the product of a design process: iterative, relational, and aesthetic in nature. Design theory, particularly in its post humanist articulations, recognizes that meaning is not embedded solely in objects but emerges from systems of relationships (Latour, 2005). Design becomes a mode of inquiry, a way of revealing and making manifest the patterns of interaction that constitute the real.
Singularity, in its scientific sense, denotes a boundary condition—such as the core of a black hole or the anticipated moment of artificial general intelligence—where prior models of understanding cease to be valid (Vinge, 1993). Philosophically, it suggests a rupture in epistemology: a site where language, logic, and causality falter. The concept thus bridges metaphysics and AI, pointing to a transrational horizon where human cognition is fundamentally transformed.
The experience of transfiguration—the transformation into a more refined or spiritual state—emerges through a triadic process: transition, translation, and transformation. This aligns with Peircean semiotics, in which meaning is not static but evolves through the interpretive process of signification (Peirce, 1955). Transition refers to temporal change; translation, to interpretive recontextualization; and transformation, to ontological shift. These processes are not merely metaphorical; they describe the cognitive and affective dynamics through which perception is reshaped.
Observation becomes the generative engine of transformation. Informed by the observer effect in quantum mechanics, this principle suggests that the act of perceiving alters the reality perceived. This renders consciousness not a passive receiver of information, but an active agent of ontological participation. The statement, “I observe, therefore I am,” thus revises Descartes' cogito to account for the entangled relationship between self, world, and knowing.
The archetype of Oneness transcends categorical knowledge. It is sensed before it is conceptualized, intuited before it is formalized. In this way, aesthetics plays a critical role. Beauty, as an expression of coherence and resonance, operates as a semiotic indicator of wholeness. From this perspective, the design process becomes an epistemic practice—a method for making the invisible visible, the implicit explicit, the potential actual.
Ultimately, Oneness may be understood as a mode of relational being, simultaneously metaphysical, psychological, and material. It is not a final state, but a recursive unfolding—a transfiguration enacted through the interplay of energy, perception, and form. This interplay underscores the inseparability of mind and matter, self and other, observer and observed.
References (APA 7th Edition)
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
- Jung, C. G. (1966). The practice of psychotherapy: Essays on the psychology of the transference and other subjects (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
- Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (J. Buchler, Ed.). Dover Publications.
- Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in the post-human era. Presented at the VISION-21 Symposium, NASA Lewis Research Center & the Ohio Aerospace Institute. Retrieved from https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
- The Birth Of God In The Soul Noema magazine, by Nathan Gardels, August 15, 20225
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited:
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.
No comments:
Post a Comment