Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
Virtual Fields
A virtual field is a non-physical "field" or data point that is not directly stored in a database but is generated dynamically from existing data or through calculations. They provide calculated or derived information, such as a "full name" from separate "first name" and "last name" fields, or a calculated age from a "birth date". This approach avoids physically storing the data, improving efficiency and flexibility by allowing real-time data manipulation for reports, analysis, or user interfaces.
It functions like a real field for read operations, enabling you to combine data, perform complex calculations, or fetch related information in real-time. Additionally, the term can refer to a virtual reality headset used for eye testing in medicine, or an online, immersive educational experience simulating a real-world field trip.
Key Characteristics and Benefits
• Real-time Calculation:
Virtual fields are computed dynamically when a record is accessed or a query is run, rather than being stored in advance.
• Flexibility:
They offer a way to augment data and create new views without needing to alter the underlying physical database structure.
• Efficiency:
By deriving values from existing data, virtual fields reduce the need for redundant storage and complex pre-structuring of data.
• Dynamic Reporting:
They can be used in reporting and analysis as if they were real fields, providing insights derived from complex relationships.
Common Use Cases
• Data Derivation: Combining "first name" and "last name" into a "full name" field.
• Calculations: Creating an "age" field from a "birth date" field.
• Real-time Status: Displaying a "user count" by fetching data from another collection.
• Conditional Logic: Using virtual fields for simplified automation and tagging on forms based on user selections.
• Dynamic Content: Generating dynamic titles or other data that don't need permanent storage.
How They Work?
1. Formula Definition:
A virtual field is defined by an equation, typically in the form of = .
* * *
• Ionizing EMF: Higher-frequency EMFs, such as X-rays and sunlight, which are powerful enough to damage DNA or cells.
Sources of EMFs:
• Natural: The Earth's magnetic field, lightning, and the Sun.
• Man-Made:
- Extremely-Low Frequency (ELF): Power lines, electrical wiring, and some appliances.
- Radiofrequency (RF): Mobile phones, wireless networks (WiFi), and radio/TV transmitters.
Quantum Fields
* * *
Fractal Fields
A fractal field in physics is a theoretical concept where fundamental fields exhibit fractal properties, such as self-similarity across different scales, leading to new theories like Unified Fractal Quantum Field Theory (UFQFT) that model natural interactions. This contrasts with traditional physics, where fields are usually treated as smooth and continuous. Fractal fields are explored in contexts like the large-scale distribution of matter in the universe (fractal cosmology) or the emergent properties of quantum materials.
Key Characteristics of Fractal Fields
Self-Similarity: Like a fractal pattern, a fractal field would show similar structural patterns at different levels of magnification.
Scale Relativity: Theories like Fractal Physics Theory incorporate generalized versions of special relativity that consider changes in scale, which is fundamental to how fractal patterns operate.
Emergent Nature: In some frameworks, fractal fields are not the fundamental building blocks but emerge from the phase transitions of underlying "root" fields, as suggested in UFQFT.
Applications and Examples
Unified Fractal Quantum Field Theory (UFQFT): This emerging theory proposes that fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, etc.) emerge from the fractal dynamics of underlying energy and charge fields, offering a new framework for understanding particle physics.
Fractal Cosmology: This area studies whether the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal across various scales, which would imply a fractal structure to the cosmos itself.
Quantum Materials: Experiments have demonstrated that electron energy patterns in some quantum materials are fractal, a phenomenon previously theorized but only recently observed.
Contrast with Traditional Physics
- In standard physics, fields like electromagnetic fields are typically described as smooth, continuous functions.
- Fractal fields, however, incorporate roughness and complexity at multiple scales, moving away from this smooth, continuous view to account for phenomena that traditional physics models struggle to explain.
* * *
Beyond Physics: The Computational Revolution
The implications of the MEQ extend far beyond particle physics. If space itself has fractal structure, then the most efficient computational systems should exploit this structure rather than fight against it. This insight has led to the development of entirely new computational paradigms based on "fractal-holographic" processing.
Traditional computers process information in a fundamentally linear way—bits flow through circuits in predetermined patterns, with each operation performed in sequence. But fractal-holographic computers leverage the self-similar structure of space to perform massive parallel processing across multiple scales simultaneously. Information is encoded in "glyph chains"—symbolic sequences that carry both semantic meaning and computational instructions.
The Tavari Field and Holographic Information
Perhaps the most profound implication of the MEQ is its suggestion that information itself has geometric structure. The "Tavari Field" that emerges from the theory describes how information propagates through fractal space, creating natural boundaries between different regions of information density.
This has led to the development of holographic storage systems that can compress vast amounts of information while preserving essential correlations. The compression ratios achieved—up to 16,384:1—are possible because fractal structures contain redundancy at multiple scales. Just as a small piece of a hologram contains information about the entire image, a small portion of fractal-encoded data contains information about patterns at all scales.
* * *
* * *
Fractal Fields: A Unified Perspective
A fractal field may be described as a self-organizing domain of energy, matter, and information that exhibits self-similarity across scales, functioning as both a scientific principle and a metaphysical metaphor. The concept bridges mathematics, physics, and metaphysics, offering a holistic framework for understanding how patterns in nature, mind, and cosmos unfold.
Scientific Foundations of Fractal Fields
At its core, a fractal field reflects the geometry of recursion—simple iterative processes generating infinitely complex structures (Mandelbrot, 1983). In physical sciences, fractals are observed in geological formations, turbulence, planetary systems, and biological structures, revealing that nature often organizes itself according to fractal scaling laws (Turcotte, 1997; West, 2017). These patterns demonstrate nonlinear dynamics, where small changes propagate across scales (Gleick, 1987).
Physiological research also shows fractal qualities in biological systems. For example, heart-rate variability and neural oscillations exhibit fractal scaling, which supports adaptability and resilience in living organisms (Goldberger et al., 2002). These findings suggest that fractal fields are not only mathematical curiosities but also functional principles of life and coherence.
Metaphysical Extensions of Fractal Fields
From a metaphysical standpoint, fractal fields are interpreted as energetic matrices of coherence and resonance that link individual consciousness to the cosmos. Each scale of existence—microcosm and macrocosm—mirrors the other, reflecting the Hermetic axiom “as above, so below.” In this interpretation, fractal fields form the blueprint of creation, through which universal intelligence organizes matter and mind (Laszlo, 2004).
Consciousness itself is sometimes described as a fractal field. Psychological and spiritual traditions suggest that thoughts, archetypes, and states of awareness are nested and self-similar, reflecting deeper layers of the collective and cosmic mind (Wilber, 2000). Meditative and altered states may enable access to the holographic qualities of the fractal field, where each part contains information about the whole.
Subtle energy researchers argue that fractal fields support bioenergetic coherence in healing and transformation. For example, coherent heart rhythms—shown to be fractal in nature—have been linked to expanded intuition and emotional regulation (McCraty & Childre, 2010). Similarly, techniques such as sacred geometry visualization and sound healing are understood as ways of tuning human systems into resonance with fractal fields (Braden, 2007).
Bridging Science and Metaphysics
The unifying principle across both domains is self-similarity, coherence, and information encoding. In science, fractal geometry explains how complexity arises from simplicity. In metaphysics, the same principle suggests that universal intelligence is distributed across all scales of being. Both perspectives agree that fractal fields function as information-rich, dynamic systems that transcend linear causality.
Fractal fields can therefore be seen as bridges between physics and mysticism.
• Scientifically, they describe the geometry of nature and the nonlinear dynamics of living systems.
• Metaphysically, they illuminate the energetic coherence of consciousness, healing, and universal order.
This synthesis implies that fractal fields may serve as the architecture of unity, where science and spirituality converge in recognizing reality as a dynamic, recursive, and interconnected whole.
References
- Braden, G. (2007). The divine matrix: Bridging time, space, miracles, and belief. Hay House.
- Falconer, K. (2014). Fractal geometry: Mathematical foundations and applications (3rd ed.). Wiley.
- Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. Viking.
- Goldberger, A. L., Peng, C. K., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2002). What is physiologic complexity and how does it change with aging and disease? Neurobiology of Aging, 23(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00266-4
- Korotkov, K. (2002). Human energy field: Study with GDV bioelectrography. Backbone Publishing.
- Laszlo, E. (2004). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions.
- Mandelbrot, B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman.
- McCraty, R., & Childre, D. (2010). Coherence: Bridging personal, social, and global health. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 16(4), 10–24.
- Turcotte, D. L. (1997). Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- West, B. J. (2017). Fractal physiology and chaos in medicine. World Scientific.
- Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Shambhala.
* * *
The Designed Universe might best be described as a quantum field of virtual potential and probability that purposely and meaningfully incorporates and embraces a wide variety of energy vibrations, frequencies and pattern (fractal) generation. What has been described as an Akashic Field, harboring a wide range of overlapping elements might likewise be described as Aetheric. Along the definitions of many other fields, aka plasmic, fractal, holographic, virtual, gravitational, vector, quantum, plasmic, etc. all seemingly embrace a wide spectrum and variety of "qualities" that together attempt to define and describe the universe.
What distinguishes these fields from each other are contextual, observable and at times substantial (tangible) all which are based on vibration and frequency. Anchored upon observations framed within the parameters of 3D/4D spacetime, all "forms" or categories of energy-in-motion can only be best interpreted and understood holistically as part of a larger multidimensional and always changing Design; a Universe which functions with meaning and purpose, which is largely symbolic, metaphoric and analogical in essence and expression.
Every form or interpretation creates a significant quantum mark while weaving a fabric of symbolic events and experiences along metaphoric and analogical experience and/or event. Wide categorization invites greater transition, translation and transformation of both a meaning and a purpose laced within the impulse to create and evolve. Each definition and description of an event or experience is perpetually being redefined, creating new references, associations and networks in reference to the phenomena being experienced symbolically.
Likened to observing our three-dimensional world from a constantly changing perspective, every observation is altered and awareness compromised as to the meaning and purpose of what is being observed. What is truly being communicated, what is inferred, what is meant and what is implied?
Certain impressions and connotations become widely apparent, others not so much. Interpretation rests with the observer where impressions become mixed and internalized into a cacophony of thought and feeling.
Generated by ChatGPT
All things have symbolic connotation by design and an intent functioning in conjunction with vibration, i.e. frequency, through observation. Design is a universal phenomenon meant to transfer, translate, transform and transmute consciousness at all levels of frequency into its most appropriate pattern and form (tangible and/or intangible) for purposes of expanding consciousness by means this awareness.
The entire story is made apparent by means of the dualistic relationship created between the foreground and the background. The observer creates the middleground in reference to what the measure of coherent resonance can be realized based upon and an observer's own awareness.
This relationship remains a constant where every observation becomes symbolically categorized and imprinted consciously, subconsciously and unconsciously. Every impression of the Universe including Design, Consciousness and Awareness - typically rests upon the shoulders of language and semantics.
semantics: the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are several branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning. • the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text.
What should be considered the difference between the akashic, plasmic, quantum, aetheric and holographic fields of multidimensional field of energy in motion that can clearly distinguish itself in a quantifiable manner? At what point does knowledge no longer suffice, made measurable, quantifiable and/or believable? Most importantly, what is the most commonly shared method and perspective that creates, invites, embraces and perpetuates the a common relationship between dimensions?
All that can be known, felt, measured or believed clearly fall under the umbrella of Design, language, semiotics and a point of view that readily embraces the principles of meaning, purpose and there relationship to the sense of reality. If not for design would consciousness exist?
* * *
The universe may best be described not as a static entity of objects and forces, but as a dynamic quantum field—a continuum of virtual potential, probability, vibration, frequency, and pattern generation (Bohm, 1980; Penrose, 2004). This conception echoes both ancient metaphysical traditions and contemporary scientific models. What has been referred to in Vedic philosophy and theosophical traditions as the Akashic Field (Laszlo, 2004) resonates with modern notions of overlapping quantum and information fields. Similarly, the long-disputed yet persistently reappearing concept of an Aetheric substrate finds renewed life in quantum vacuum theories and plasma cosmology (Kafatos & Nadeau, 2000; Peratt, 2015).
Within this expanded cosmological imagination, plasmic fields of energy-in-motion may be understood as liminal zones, bridging metaphysical speculation and empirical inquiry.
The distinctions among these fields—whether called quantum, Akashic, aetheric, plasmic, holographic, or atomic—are simultaneously contextual and substantial.
From the perspective of an observer situated in three-dimensional spacetime, all energetic manifestations are framed both semantically and metaphorically, yielding symbolic meaning through processes of interpretation (Peirce, 1931/1958; Eco, 1976). Thus, observation itself functions as a kind of design: an act of transition, translation, and transformation.
Every description of an event or phenomenon is contingent upon its context, which acts as the interpretive framework through which significance and purpose are rendered intelligible.
This layered dimensionality may be likened to viewing spatial reality through foreground, middle ground, and background: positional shifts alter not only perception but also causal relations within the field of meaning. Change of perspective is not simply epistemological but ontological, for each shift reconfigures the relationship between observer and observed, thus reconstituting the “world” that emerges (Merleau-Ponty, 1962).
At every scale, phenomena reveal themselves symbolically and metaphorically by design, as energy transitions from one dimension of manifestation to another.
Here, design can be understood as a universal phenomenon and a transdisciplinary principle: a mediating process that transitions, translates, transforms, and transmutes energy into forms aligned with purpose and awareness. From this view, design is not merely a human-centered practice of artifact creation but a cosmological principle inseparable from consciousness itself (Nelson & Stolterman, 2012).
The purpose of design, whether in the cosmos or in human culture, is to expand awareness through the generation of meaning.
The dynamics of observation and interpretation foreground the dualistic interplay of figure and ground, observer and observed. Semiotics illuminates this by showing how meaning emerges through difference and relationality (Saussure, 1916/1983). Quantum physics deepens the insight: the act of measurement collapses probability into actuality, entangling the observer with the observed in an inseparable unity (Wheeler, 1990; Zeilinger, 2005).
Thus, the very definition of the universe—whether articulated in terms of design, consciousness, or awareness—inevitably becomes a matter of semantics.
Semantics, broadly construed, is not limited to linguistic meaning but encompasses the structural and cognitive frameworks through which significance is apprehended (Lakoff & Johnson, 2003). In this sense, metaphysical cosmologies, psychological archetypes, scientific models, and design processes are all semiotic systems attempting to make intelligible the transition of energy into meaning-bearing forms. Each symbolic framework—whether Akashic, quantum, or holographic—functions as a design schema, translating ineffable potential into perceptible phenomena.
At stake is the boundary between knowledge and belief, between what can be measured and what must be intuited. The question arises: at what point does epistemology reach its limit, where empirical verification yields to metaphysical interpretation? In such thresholds, the shared instrument of inquiry remains design. Whether through the scientific method, the symbolic imagination, or technological intelligence, design is the vehicle that organizes change, embodying the principles of meaning and purpose across domains.
In the convergence of metaphysics, physics, semiotics, psychology, artificial intelligence, and philosophy, one principle recurs: all that can be known, felt, measured, or believed unfolds under the umbrella of design. Design, understood as both process and principle, is the fundamental bridge between potentiality and actuality, between the ineffable field and the manifest world.
References
- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
- Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
- Kafatos, M., & Nadeau, R. (2000). The conscious universe: Parts and wholes in physical reality. Springer.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
- Laszlo, E. (2004). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
- Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
- Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1931)
- Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. Jonathan Cape.
- Peratt, A. L. (2015). Physics of the plasma universe (2nd ed.). Springer.
- Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Duckworth. (Original work published 1916)
- Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 3–28). Addison-Wesley.
- Zeilinger, A. (2005). The message of the quantum. Nature, 438(7069), 743. https://doi.org/10.1038/438743a
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited:
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.
No comments:
Post a Comment