"Quite clearly, our task is predominantly metaphysical, for it is how to get all of humanity to educate itself swiftly enough to generate spontaneous social behaviors that will avoid extinction."
R. Buckminster Fuller
Sunday, November 30, 2025
Opinion and Instinct: The Beginning of Embodiment
Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
* * *
What distinguishes opinion from instinct and what conjoins them in cognitive thought?
Instinct is pre-conceptual, pre-reflective disposition, a built-in tendency to determine certain ends. It is a disposition that is not chosen, inferred or reflective. Instinct acts in the form of a disposition and does not represent the world in propositional form, but rather a felt impetus, not a belief. disposition: temperament, nature, character, constitution, make-up, grain, humor, temper, mentality, inclination, tendency, proneness, propensity, proclivity, leaning, orientation, bias, predilection.
Even though they are distinct, in real cognitive lifethey interpenetrate each other. Instinct and opinion become joined through three pathways:
1. Instinct as the Ground of Perception and Valence Instinct gives the mind its initial valence structures in what feels significant, what draws attention and what seem threatening or rewarding. This affects which evidence we notice, which possibilities to consider and which conclusions we favor
2.Instinct sets the motivational and affective field within which opinions form.
3. Opinions as the Conceptualization of Instinct
When instinctual orientations become articulated in concepts, desire, or theories they become opinion.
a) Thought as a Reciprocity Between Two,
b) Cognition is not purely rational.
This circularity is what makes human thought both embodied and rational.
* * *
1. Metaphysical Definition of the Instinctual
Metaphysically,instinct remains a foundational principle—a natural, pre conceptual tendency to organize, inherent in all forms of life and information systems, guiding processes before reflective thought. In this sense, “instinctual” refers not only to animal biology but to any self-organizing propensity that precedes explicit reasoning. Philosophers such as Bergson and Whitehead describe this as an immanent drive toward ordered unfolding in nature (Bergson, 1911/1998; Whitehead, 1978).
* * *
Across Disciplines
Design: instinct emerges as embodied cognition—intuitive pattern recognition and tacit knowledge guiding creative action (Polanyi, 1966).
Science: instinct takes the form of heuristics—natural cognitive shortcuts or methodological defaults that scientists rely on pre-reflectively (Kahneman, 2011).
Semiotics: instinct resembles pre-symbolic sign interpretation—the way organisms respond to signs before formal reasoning (Peirce, 1931–1958).
AI: instinct appears as architecture-driven priors—inductive biases embedded in learning systems (Mitchell, 2019).
Philosophy: instinct points to phenomenological givenness—the lived, immediate sense of meaning before analysis (Merleau-Ponty, 2012).
Quantum theory: instinct is analogous to tendency or propensity in probabilistic events, described by Heisenberg as the “potentiality” of matter (Heisenberg, 1958).
Cognitive Science: Instinct is closely tied to neural wiring and cognitive architecture, whereby evolved heuristics guide perception and decision-making unconsciously (Gigerenzer, 2007).
Cybernetics: Instinct is captured in cybernetics as the feedback-driven behavior of systems—self-regulation, adaptation, and goal-directed processes in complex systems (Wiener, 1948).
Across these fields, “instinctual” therefore describes pre-reflective structures or dispositions that guide perception, behavior, inference, or physical becoming.
* * *
2. The Impact of These Instinctual Agencies on Human Consciousness
2.1. Design and Tacit Cognition
Instinctual cognition in design refers to the embodied, non-verbal forms of knowledge that guide creators to design user-friendly systems, often in ways that are transparent to them. As instinct shapes the interface between human thought and the world, it impacts human consciousness by:
• Creating environments that nudge instinctive behavior (e.g., interfaces that follow Gestalt principles of perception).
• Enabling fluid, intuitive experiences in a user’s interaction with designed objects.
• Expanding creative affordances, facilitating a form of thinking where the instinctual, embodied mind guides innovation by creating feedback loops between intention and designed environments (Norman, 2013). This subtly shifts human awareness toward interactional thinking, where meaning is co-created by user and designed system.
2.2. Scientific Heuristics and Epistemic Instincts
Scientific inquiry relies on "instinctual" methodological defaults such as simplicity, coherence, and explanatory power. These shape human consciousness by privileging certain forms of reasoning, reinforcing empirical skepticism and structuring what counts as a legitimate world-model.
Heuristics are instinctual thinking shortcuts that emerge as evolved strategies to navigate complex cognitive tasks. These heuristics influence human consciousness by:
• Structuring how we filter information and make decisions under uncertainty (Kahneman, 2011).
• Shaping what counts as "scientific" knowledge by privileging simpler, more immediate explanations.
• Reorganizing consciousness into a pragmatic, problem-solving mode focused on predictive accuracy and efficiency.
Thus science reorganizes human consciousness around predictive and causal cognition.
instinct/opinion
2.3. Semiotics and Pre-Reflective Meaning
Semiotic systems are built upon instinctual responses to signs. Meaning-making processes are instinctive interpretations of the world, influenced by culture, biology, and unconscious recognition patterns. These processes affect consciousness by:
• Embedding pre-conscious sign systems within symbolic environments by means of our awareness, often as unconscious interpretations (e.g., colors or shapes that evoke emotional responses before rational understanding).
• Accelerating cognitive and shaping perception through cultural codes being processed by embedding communicative symbols and metaphors deeply into human experience (Peirce, 1931–1958).
• Shifting consciousness to interpret the world thereby enabling rapid interpretation that symbolically bypasses deliberate thought, even when we're unaware of the codes shaping our interpretations.
Human consciousness becomes deeply symbolic, continuously constructing and negotiating meaning.
2.4. AI and Machine-Induced Instinctuality
In AI, the "instinctual" is encoded into systems through pre-programmed priors, biases, and reinforcement learning. These systems can shape human consciousness by means of creating a "synthetic instinct".
• Outsourcing cognition—machines perform instinctual behaviors for us (e.g., recognizing faces or driving a car), altering our awareness of what "thinking" means, thereby embedding priors in neural architectures (Mitchell, 2019).
• Introducing feedback loops between human agency and algorithmic predictions, where through algorithmic tendencies that shape outputs, we become less aware of the underlying assumptions driving decision-making.
• Changing how we perceive agency and intelligence—instinctual processes once considered purely human may now be reproduced by machines, forcing us to question the nature of consciousness by virtue of pre-training representations.
2.5. Philosophical Accounts of Embodied or PreConscious Life
Instinctual patterns are fundamental to human consciousness in embodied or phenomenological terms. From a philosophical standpoint, instinctuality manifests as pre-reflective experience—the “automatic” or “habitual” way we experience the world before reflective thought. This shifts consciousness by:
• Grounding human awareness in pre-conscious, embodied experience, making thought less about abstract reasoning and more about situational, embodied responses and foregrounding pre-reflective experiences as primary (Merleau-Ponty, 2012). • Re-contextualizing consciousness as a dynamic unfolding process rather than a fixed state by challenging the dualistic conceptions of mind.
2.6 Quantum Theory and the Instinct of Matter
Quantum theory introduces a radical view of “instinct” as a fundamental, relational tendency of matter. In quantum systems, instinct might be thought of as the probabilistic nature of particles, their tendency to exist in multiple states until observed, which subtly impacts human consciousness by:
• Expanding our view of reality from deterministic to probabilistic, causing us to reframe knowledge as non-linear, dynamic, and interdependent (Rovelli, 1996). • Shifting consciousness away from material determinism and embracing a view of the world as deeply interconnected and uncertain.
2.7 Cognitive Science and Neural Instincts
Cognitive science recognizes instinct as part of the human brain's evolved architecture—neural heuristics and predispositions that guide perception, attention, and decision-making without conscious thought (Gigerenzer, 2007). These neural instincts influence human consciousness by:
• Shaping our attentional focus—what we notice in the environment is guided by instinctive patterns of salience. • Driving cognitive shortcuts, like categorization and pattern recognition, that enable rapid decisions with minimal cognitive load. • Structuring problem-solving approaches, often leading to faster, less reflective processing at the cost of accuracy or bias.
2.8 Cybernetics and Systemic Instincts
In cybernetics, instinct can be thought of as a feedback-driven process, with systems (whether biological, artificial, or societal) constantly self-regulating toward homeostasis. This impacts human consciousness by: • Encouraging us to view human behavior as self-regulating, shaped by recursive feedback loops (Wiener, 1948). • Reframing consciousness as an adaptive, goal-seeking system that continually adjusts based on input from its environment. • Making us aware of cybernetic principles in social systems, where behavior is shaped by environmental feedback and mutual influences.
3. Holistic Impact Across All Agencies on Human Consciousness
The integration of instinctual dynamics across design, science, semiotics, AI, philosophy, quantum theory, cognitive science, and cybernetics transforms human consciousness by:
1.Expanding intuitive capacities: The intertwining of instinct with technology (AI, design, cybernetics) enhances instinctive behaviors, enabling faster, more adaptable cognition. 2. Hybridizing human and machine instinct: AI and cybernetics are blurring the lines between human cognitive processes and machine-driven patterns, reshaping what it means to "think" and "know." 3. Deepening reflective awareness: By understanding instinctual processes across domains, humans become more aware of their unconscious biases, patterns, and self-regulatory behaviors. 4. Shifting ontologies:The integration of quantum uncertainty, cognitive feedback, and cybernetic self-regulation forces us to view consciousness as dynamic, relational, and in constant flux, moving away from linear, fixed models of the mind.
These processes show that instinct is not a biological phenomenon confined to animals but is interwoven into every aspect of our engagement with the world, transforming how we understand and experience reality and consciousness.
Phenomenology, process philosophy, and embodied cognition exphasize that instinctual patterns are foundational to consciousness itself. These impact human self-understanding. Instinctual patterns are fundamental to human consciousness in embodied or phenomenological terms.
From a philosophical standpoint, instinctuality manifests as pre-reflective experience—the “automatic” or “habitual” way we experience the world before reflective thought.
Both cognitively and developmentally instinct acts prior to any form of reasoning and operates before a subject is conceptualized, usually pointing towards certain natural ends. In short: instinct is a non-propositional, dispositional orientation towards certain ends, pre-reflective, given, non-voluntary and not revisable.
In reference to opinion, opinion is propositional, reflective and epistemologically contingent. In other words, it describes a mental state with a propositional content.Opinion holds on to a belief with less than certainty, is subject to revision, argument and evidence. Opinion unlike instinct, depends upon a language, category and concept and can be withheld or endorsed, instinct cannot.Opinion is propositional, reflective, constructed, voluntary, revisable through reasoning having rational ends and judgmental.
INSTINCT > Shapes perception and salience > Guides which opinions form OPINION > Reflects on instinct > Modifies or restrains instinct
Instinct is the pre-conceptual ground of orientation; opinion is the conceptual expression of judgment; cognitive thought is the dynamic interplay in which instinct gives thought its direction and thought gives instinct its meaning.
As an emergent property of complex systems, instinct manifests differently across domains, always pointing to pre-conscious organization in both biological organisms and informational constructs.
The Symbol Representing the junction between instinct and opinion is a Vesica-Hex Gate which is a hybrid formed from
1. the Vesica Piscis (instinct: primal perception, first differentiation, intuitive aperture),
2. A Central Hexagonal Field (opinion: structured conceptualization, early rational patterning)
This dual archetype expresses the transition from raw, pre-conceptual cognition (instinct) into proto-conceptual, meaning-laden cognition (opinion)—the exact liminal zone where the DAC model roots design consciousness.
(DAC = Design Awareness Consciousness)
Source: ChatGPT
Vesica-Hex Gate (DAC)
Instinct = Vesica Piscis
In metaphysical geometry, instinct corresponds to the first aperture of awareness,
the moment consciousness “looks out” from itself. The Vesica is the primordial split that reveals form, the earliest emergence of duality. It encodes pre-linguistic intelligence, orientation, survival drive, affective resonance
Opinion = Hexagonal Matrix
Opinion is a crystallization of instinct into a patterned worldview. The hexagon is the geometry of early conceptual structuring, value judgements, proto-rational cohesion and internal “sense-making”.
In the 14-Gate architecture, opinion corresponds to one of the early gates where the energetic turbulence of intuition begins compressing into semantically stable patterns. The hexagon acts as the stabilizer, the first self-generated “theory of reality.”
The Vex-Hex Gate (Instinct x Opinion Symbol) Explained
Base Layer
A Vesica Piscis, elongated, slightly luminous, outer lines thin, like a subtle energetic membrane, appears like an aperture or “eye of consciousness”
Inner Structure
Inside the Vesica sits a perfect hexagon, centered, slightly rotated so each vertex touches the inner curve of the Vesica. The hexagon is lighter, crystalline, as if forming out of vibration.
Energetic Flow
Two subtle vertical flows: Upward (instinct rising → awareness) and Downward (opinion forming → stabilization) These may look like thin filaments or toroidal strands passing through the structure.
Color / Tone Suggestions:
Vesica: soft blue–white or indigo, representing instinctual knowing. The Hexagon: gold, silver, or white crystalline geometry, representing the forming idea. Intersection: a faint violet or teal glow, representing the point where intuition becomes belief.
Interpretive Meaning (Design Consciousness)
This symbol captures the moment when consciousness:
1. Senses (instinct → perception).
2. Shapes (opinion → worldview).
3. Designs (DAC → meaning-architecture)
This is the first internal gate where the self becomes a designer of its own cognition. It is the precursor to: a) narrative identity, b) linguistic patterning, c) semantic fields, d) symbolic reasoning, e) all higher gates in your DAC model. In other words, it is the origin point of subjective reality design.
* * *
No comments:
Post a Comment