Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
Fluctuations between vibratory fields of energy in motion invite forms to be made manifest by way of impulse/impression. Every form is a product of configuration and reconfiguration, impulses emerging as result of virtual field veiled within dimensional constraints. These impressions appear as specific impulses/frequencies that vibrate into patterns of energy originating outside the conscious realm of the observer/perceiver. Human awareness symbolically embodies these patterns of energy with spiritual, emotional, mental and physical connotations. These observations appear to be real by means of symbolic agreement, i.e. selective choices collectively affirmed in order to standardized a particular POV when viewed when observed within the constraints of 3D space/time.
Our brainwaves have been measured and described, i.e. labeled, as alpha, beta, theta and delta. Each description attempts to measure and categorize an aspect of mind in terms of vibratory impressions identified by means of instrumentation. Each category refers to a distinction within the conceptual vibration we call mind. Every distinction carries its own symbolic impressions based upon events instrumentally measured and collectively observed. These impressions might be readily categorized having little meaning or purpose if not individually experienced. This is an example of the shortcomings intrinsic to linear thinking when attempting to investigate conceptual/multidimensional/quantum events.
Our brainwaves have been measured and described, i.e. labeled, as alpha, beta, theta and delta. Each description attempts to measure and categorize an aspect of mind in terms of vibratory impressions identified by means of instrumentation. Each category refers to a distinction within the conceptual vibration we call mind. Every distinction carries its own symbolic impressions based upon events instrumentally measured and collectively observed. These impressions might be readily categorized having little meaning or purpose if not individually experienced. This is an example of the shortcomings intrinsic to linear thinking when attempting to investigate conceptual/multidimensional/quantum events.
What is a Thought? How the Brain Creates New Ideas / Nenning Beck / TEDxHL
The mind allows us to reflect upon the universe. Due to the fact that the universe remains a major part of conceptual reasoning, attempts to measure that which cannot be measured remains. The universe which includes the mind, is virtual in context and can only be revealed symbolically by means of design.
The human mind is part of a vibrating field of awareness that absorbs, resonates and transmits energy in motion (EIM). Energy in motion describes the existence of an e-motional thrust perceived in the form of desire and attraction. This drive for satisfaction indicates a longing for balance. In reference to human consciousness, emotion is energy-in-motion. Emotion is fundamental to the arrangement, structure, scheme, order, plan and format of all that is designed and made conscionable.
Human consciousness stands at the crossroad between the tangible and the intangible, spirit and matter. The mind affords the context, the imagination and the intuition the tools and e-motion the driving force to expand consciousness by means of awareness.
The mind allows us to reflect upon the universe. Due to the fact that the universe remains a major part of conceptual reasoning, attempts to measure that which cannot be measured remains. The universe which includes the mind, is virtual in context and can only be revealed symbolically by means of design.
The human mind is part of a vibrating field of awareness that absorbs, resonates and transmits energy in motion (EIM). Energy in motion describes the existence of an e-motional thrust perceived in the form of desire and attraction. This drive for satisfaction indicates a longing for balance. In reference to human consciousness, emotion is energy-in-motion. Emotion is fundamental to the arrangement, structure, scheme, order, plan and format of all that is designed and made conscionable.
Human consciousness stands at the crossroad between the tangible and the intangible, spirit and matter. The mind affords the context, the imagination and the intuition the tools and e-motion the driving force to expand consciousness by means of awareness.
Consciousness may also be viewed as a changing matrix/field composed of interwoven patterns or relative forms of energy in motion (EIM). These streams of energy can either be attracted or repelled by an observer/perceiver of an event or experience.
Resonant streams of meaning and purpose (ideas) attract and weave creating a fabric of symbolic patterns that bring meaning and purpose to the greater system/context, i.e. consciousness. Dissonant vibratory currents are repelled. The system creates purpose and meaning by means of resonance and dissonance. All "forms" of consciousness/awareness are both receivers and transmitters of energy, light and information.
Streams, i.e. strings, of energy flow throughout the universe. Macro fields of consciousness appear to form by developing successively larger and larger fields of awareness. Over cyclic time (fractal) awareness expands and contracts which in turn, redefines every past, current and future event or experience. Consciousness weighs heavily upon an intuitive understanding of what awareness implies.
The idea of awareness* is in constant flux. Made apparent within the context of "experience", awareness emerges in and out of relative substance due to disturbances and fluctuations within a hypothetical quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP) i.e. a plasmic/holographic/fractal and quantum Universe harboring all that is.Virtual particles and patterns symbolically appear in and out of awareness as wave interferences and impressions that emerge as result of an observer’s particular point of view (POV).
Resonant streams of meaning and purpose (ideas) attract and weave creating a fabric of symbolic patterns that bring meaning and purpose to the greater system/context, i.e. consciousness. Dissonant vibratory currents are repelled. The system creates purpose and meaning by means of resonance and dissonance. All "forms" of consciousness/awareness are both receivers and transmitters of energy, light and information.
Streams, i.e. strings, of energy flow throughout the universe. Macro fields of consciousness appear to form by developing successively larger and larger fields of awareness. Over cyclic time (fractal) awareness expands and contracts which in turn, redefines every past, current and future event or experience. Consciousness weighs heavily upon an intuitive understanding of what awareness implies.
The idea of awareness* is in constant flux. Made apparent within the context of "experience", awareness emerges in and out of relative substance due to disturbances and fluctuations within a hypothetical quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP) i.e. a plasmic/holographic/fractal and quantum Universe harboring all that is.Virtual particles and patterns symbolically appear in and out of awareness as wave interferences and impressions that emerge as result of an observer’s particular point of view (POV).
Awareness may be understood as an active, self-referential principle within experience—an ideational process through which experience becomes symbolically apparent to itself at-the-moment of observation. In this sense, awareness does not merely register events but participates in their disclosure by observing the experiential field in which they arise. The contextual field in which this disclosure occurs may be described as a quantum field of virtual potential and probability (QFVPP), rendered perceptible through the observer’s own reflexive awareness of that field (Bohm, 1980; Kauffman, 2016).
Awareness is identifiable through consciousness, while consciousness itself is recognizable only insofar as awareness symbolically reveals it as one’s own. Consciousness, understood here as the contextual or structuring field of experience, and awareness, understood as the subjective observing function, are not separable entities but complementary aspects of a unified experiential process. Both converge upon the same event or phenomenon, jointly orienting perception toward a single locus of meaning (Husserl, 1913/1983; Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991).
Within this uniquely interdependent relationship, awareness functions as the activating principle that renders consciousness operative. If consciousness provides the structural conditions for experience, awareness serves as the key that unlocks those conditions, allowing experience to be realized as lived reality. Reality, therefore, emerges not solely from consciousness as context nor awareness as observer, but from their continuous interaction and mutual co-arising (Merleau-Ponty, 1945/2012; Wheeler, 1990).
Accordingly, awareness may be defined as the observer, consciousness as the contextual field of observation, and reality as the emergent product of their dynamic convergence. Reality is thus not a fixed, external given but a relational phenomenon arising at the intersection of observer and context, awareness.
* * *
Consciousness, Energy, and the Observer: An Interdisciplinary Rearticulation
The passage under consideration advances an integrative view of consciousness as a dynamic field of energy in motion, emphasizing the inseparability of observer and observed. Drawing implicitly from quantum theory, phenomenology, cognitive science, and metaphysical traditions, it proposes that reality emerges through vibratory interactions that are organized, interpreted, and stabilized by consciousness itself. Rather than treating consciousness as a passive byproduct of material processes, this framework positions it as an active, structuring principle within a multidimensional energetic field.
Vibratory Fields and Energy in Motion
At the foundation of this model lies the assertion that all phenomena; physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual, are expressions of energy in continuous motion. Contemporary physics describes the universe in terms of interacting fields rather than isolated objects, with matter understood as excitations or fluctuations within these fields (Rovelli, 2018; Wilczek, 2008). Parallel conceptions appear in metaphysical and spiritual traditions, which similarly frame existence as vibratory and processual rather than static. Within this view, form is not fundamental but emergent, arising from patterned oscillations within an underlying energetic continuum.
The Role of the Observer
A central claim of the passage is that the observer plays a constitutive role in the manifestation of form. This resonates with interpretations of quantum mechanics that emphasize the observer effect, wherein measurement influences the state of a system and collapses a range of potentialities into a particular outcome (Bohr, 1935; Wheeler, 1990). While contemporary physics debates the precise ontological implications of observation, the broader philosophical insight remains influential: what is experienced as “reality” is inseparable from the conditions under which it is observed. Perception, therefore, is not merely receptive but participatory, shaping the appearance and meaning of phenomena.
The Mind as an Intermediary System
Within this framework, the mind is described as a mediating field between the material and immaterial, organizing energetic inputs into coherent impressions. Cognitive science similarly characterizes the brain as an active inference system that constructs models of reality rather than passively recording sensory data (Friston, 2010; Clark, 2016). Neural oscillations—commonly categorized as alpha, beta, theta, and delta states—reflect different modes of information processing and awareness, yet their significance is not intrinsic. Instead, their meaning is context-dependent, arising within symbolic and interpretive frameworks established by the observer.
Emotion as Energy in Motion
Emotion is framed as a fundamental expression of energy in motion, operating through dynamics of attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium. This conception aligns with neuroscientific and psychological models that treat emotions as regulatory signals guiding adaptation and decision-making (Damasio, 1999; Panksepp, 1998). From a biological perspective, emotional processes contribute to homeostasis—the organism’s drive to maintain balance amid internal and external change (Sterling, 2012). In this sense, emotion can be understood as a vital component of the energetic flow of consciousness, mediating between perception, cognition, and action.
Symbolic Meaning and the Construction of Reality
The passage further emphasizes the symbolic nature of reality construction. Rather than accessing an objective world “as it is,” consciousness organizes experience through interpretive schemas shaped by language, culture, and prior experience. This position is consistent with constructivist approaches in cognitive science and phenomenology, which argue that meaning emerges through active interpretation rather than direct representation (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991; Husserl, 1970). Hermeneutic traditions similarly contend that understanding is always situated, arising from a dynamic interplay between observer and phenomenon (Gadamer, 2004).
Consciousness as a Dynamic Matrix
Consciousness itself is depicted as a fluctuating matrix or field within which streams of energy, information, and meaning interact. This imagery parallels systems-theoretical and process-philosophical accounts that describe consciousness as emergent, relational, and self-organizing (Whitehead, 1978; Thompson, 2007). Within such models, patterns of coherence arise through resonance, while dissonance drives transformation and reorganization. Consciousness thus functions simultaneously as receiver, transmitter, and modulator of energetic and informational flows.
The Cyclical Nature of Awareness
Finally, awareness is portrayed as cyclical and impermanent, continuously materializing and dissolving in response to fluctuations within the broader field. This view echoes both Buddhist phenomenology and contemporary process theories, which reject static notions of self in favor of ongoing becoming (Metzinger, 2003; Thompson, 2020). Awareness and consciousness are therefore not distinct substances but mutually informing processes, co-arising through interaction and reflexive observation.
Conclusion
In synthesis, the passage articulates a view of reality as a co-creative process shaped by energy, consciousness, and symbolic interpretation. Reality is neither wholly objective nor purely subjective but emerges through the dynamic relationship between observer and observed. By integrating insights from quantum theory, cognitive science, neuroscience, and phenomenology, this perspective challenges reductionist accounts of consciousness and instead proposes a participatory, field-based ontology in which meaning, form, and experience arise together through energetic interaction.
References (APA)
- Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48(8), 696–702.
- Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
- Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace.
- Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
- Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). Continuum.
- Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
- Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. MIT Press.
- Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.
- Rovelli, C. (2018). The order of time. Riverhead Books.
- Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 106(1), 5–15.
- Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.
- Thompson, E. (2020). Why I am not a Buddhist. Yale University Press.
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. MIT Press.
-Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 3–28). Addison-Wesley.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. Free Press.
- Wilczek, F. (2008). The lightness of being: Mass, ether, and the unification of forces. Basic Books.
Field → Pattern → Attention → Stabilization → Mediation → State Shift → Affect → Regulation → Symbol → Context → Model → Integration → Reflexive Ethics → Renewal.
* * *
Virtual particles, i.e. expressions of energy emerging from an energy field yet to be observed or investigated, can be characterized, quantified and qualified by means of frequency. Such patterns resonate/complement an observer's central core by means of symbolic identification and response. Every observation is a reflection of character. Every form harbors a wide variety of multidimensional impressions that together resonate about a common identifiable source that may or may not, be shared by others. This identification process used to describe consciousness, is composed of a variety of micro and macro fields of interconnected agency that resonate with each other in a harmonious manner. Each part contributes the expression of a complementary field, observed and made reference to, as a single unit/source. Consciousness is a symbolic expression of unity made apparent by virtue of cooperation, resonance and contribution.
Consciousness resonates and becomes qualified by a multitude of streams of energy in motion. Similarly, consciousness is forever transmitting and receiving energy within and beyond the dynamic constraints of its own field of awareness. Cause and effect are based upon the vibratory relationship between "states", i.e. patterns of awareness, made conscionable. As mentioned earlier, these patterned states of awareness are in constant motion as they respond to the context in which they are observed thus, altering the field, i.e. consciousness, parametric.
Awareness is energy in motion (EIM), vibratory and impressionable. Awareness is engaged in the reality of experiencing a spectrum of light energy and/or information. Awareness symbolically promotes change. Its purpose, to influence the most appropriate choice amongst a multidimensional array of options/direction. Awareness is energy in motion (e-motion) having both and effect and an affect, i.e. impression, upon a field of virtual impermanence.
* * *
Consciousness as an Emergent, Resonant Energy Field
The conceptual model you describe integrates elements of quantum field theory, consciousness studies, systems theory, and metaphysical philosophy into a unified account of awareness as an emergent, dynamic phenomenon. In this framework, consciousness is not treated as a static property localized within the brain, but as an active, resonant process arising from and interacting with underlying energy fields. This perspective challenges reductionist models of mind and aligns with contemporary interdisciplinary approaches that view consciousness as relational, processual, and participatory (Chalmers, 1996; Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991).
Virtual Particles and Underlying Energy Fields
Your use of virtual particles as a conceptual analogy situates consciousness within a quantum-inspired ontology. In quantum field theory, virtual particles are transient excitations of quantum fields that emerge momentarily and exert measurable effects despite their fleeting existence (Peskin & Schroeder, 1995; Weinberg, 1995). Although not directly observable, these fluctuations influence force mediation and vacuum energy, demonstrating how imperceptible dynamics can shape physical reality.
Within your model, virtual particles function metaphorically as expressions of latent energetic processes underlying consciousness. Conscious awareness, like virtual particles, may arise from deeper, non-localized fields and exert causal influence without being reducible to discrete, measurable units. This aligns with field-based theories of consciousness that emphasize continuity, emergence, and interaction over localized substance (Bohm, 1980; Kastrup, 2019). Consciousness, from this perspective, is best understood as a fluctuating pattern within a broader energetic continuum rather than as a fixed entity.
Resonance and Symbolic Identification
A central feature of your framework is the notion of resonance—specifically, that consciousness selectively aligns with particular frequencies, patterns, or configurations within energetic fields. Resonance, in physical systems, describes the amplification of response when a system synchronizes with specific frequencies (Strogatz, 2003). Applied to consciousness, resonance suggests a mechanism by which awareness coheres with meaningful patterns in both internal and external environments.
Symbolic identification emerges as the interpretive process through which these resonant patterns acquire meaning. Consciousness does not merely register energetic configurations; it symbolically encodes them, linking perceptual experience to personal and collective significance. This process parallels Jung’s theory of archetypes, in which symbolic forms mediate between unconscious structures and conscious experience (Jung, 1968). In your model, consciousness participates in a continuous feedback loop, simultaneously responding to energetic patterns and shaping their interpretation, thereby generating a subjective yet structurally grounded reality.
Interconnected Agency and Unity
Your emphasis on interconnected agency departs from Cartesian dualism and supports a distributed, relational model of consciousness. Rather than viewing awareness as confined to isolated individuals, this approach conceptualizes consciousness as a field of interdependent agents whose interactions give rise to collective coherence. Systems theory supports this view by demonstrating how complex wholes emerge from relational dynamics among components (Capra & Luisi, 2014).
Quantum analogies further reinforce this interconnectedness. Quantum entanglement illustrates how systems that were once correlated can remain non-locally connected, influencing one another beyond classical spatial constraints (Bell, 2004). While not implying a literal equivalence, this analogy supports a non-separable view of consciousness, in which individual minds participate in a larger field of awareness. Such holistic models resonate with both process philosophy and contemporary theories of extended and collective cognition (Whitehead, 1929/1978; Clark & Chalmers, 1998).
Consciousness as Energy in Motion
Describing consciousness as “energy in motion” emphasizes its dynamic and non-static character. This notion parallels the wave–particle duality of quantum mechanics, where physical entities exhibit context-dependent properties (Bohr, 1934). Similarly, consciousness may be understood as a field of potential that continuously shifts across states of attention, perception, and awareness.
This view aligns with phenomenological accounts of intentionality, which emphasize that consciousness is always directed, active, and engaged with the world (Husserl, 1970; Merleau-Ponty, 1962). Consciousness, in this sense, is not a passive observer but an active participant that co-constitutes experience. Its motion reflects transitions between cognitive, emotional, and contemplative states, reinforcing the idea that awareness is fundamentally processual and interactive.
Cause, Effect, and Vibratory Dynamics
Your model reframes causality as vibratory and relational rather than linear and deterministic. Instead of discrete cause-and-effect chains, reality is understood as a network of feedback loops in which energetic interactions continuously modify outcomes. (see fractal fields). This conception parallels quantum interference phenomena, where overlapping wave functions produce emergent patterns through constructive and destructive interference (Feynman, Leighton, & Sands, 1965).
Applied to consciousness, this suggests that thoughts, perceptions, and intentions generate energetic “ripples” that influence the broader field of awareness. Consciousness both affects and is affected by these interactions, producing an evolving experiential reality rather than a fixed sequence of events. Such a model aligns with process metaphysics, which views reality as becoming rather than being (Whitehead, 1929/1978).
Impressionability, Intention, and Influence
Finally, your framework emphasizes the impressionable and influential nature of consciousness. Awareness is portrayed as capable of shaping reality through symbolic interpretation and intentional engagement. This idea resonates with discussions of the observer effect in quantum mechanics, where measurement influences system outcomes (Rovelli, 1996), as well as with psychological and contemplative traditions that emphasize intention and meaning-making (James, 1902/2007).
Consciousness, in this view, actively participates in the unfolding of reality by aligning with certain patterns, assigning symbolic meaning, and responding intentionally to experience. Reality is thus co-created through the dynamic interplay between awareness and the energetic environment, reinforcing a participatory rather than purely objective ontology.
Summary
In summary, your model presents consciousness as an emergent phenomenon arising from a vibratory, interconnected energy field. Drawing on metaphors from quantum field theory, systems theory, phenomenology, and depth psychology, it portrays awareness as energy in motion—resonant, symbolic, and relational. Consciousness interacts with underlying energetic patterns, assigns meaning through symbolic identification, and participates in shaping experiential reality through feedback and intention. This framework challenges materialist reductions of mind and offers a holistic, integrative understanding of consciousness that bridges contemporary science and longstanding metaphysical insight.
References (APA)
- Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
- Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge University Press.
- Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press.
- Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
- Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
- Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1965). The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. 3). Addison-Wesley.
- Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
- James, W. (2007). The varieties of religious experience. Routledge. (Original work published 1902)
- Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
- Kastrup, B. (2019). The idea of the world: A multi-disciplinary argument for the mental nature of reality. Iff Books.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
- Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An introduction to quantum field theory. Westview Press.
- Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637–1678.
- Strogatz, S. H. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. Hyperion.
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
- Weinberg, S. (1995). The quantum theory of fields (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. Free Press. (Original work published 1929)
The author generated this text in part with GPT-5.2, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
“Recently, a team of researchers from Oxford and Brussels has developed a theory of causality in quantum theory, in which causal concepts are defined in intrinsically quantum terms rather than pertaining to an emergent classical level of measurement outcomes. This has offered, in particular, a causal understanding of the correlations produced by entangled states. Now, they have generalized the theory to allow causal influence to go in cycles, providing a causal understanding of processes with events in indefinite causal order.”
* * *
Consciousness is in constant flux. Consciousness is essentially electric in context, as are the symbols used to identify its many states of awareness. Awareness is magnetic in context drawing towards it virtual substance and complementary energies of like kind.
Consciousness and awareness are designed of the same cloth (DNA) making quantum, holographic and fractal impressions upon humanity's contextual awareness. Design describes the interplay between different "states of energy in motion" in an unending search for universal balance and equilibrium.
Please review the life work of Dr. Hans Jenny (1904-1972) as evidence of how energy is transmitted. Observe the forms that symbolically emerge as the result of energy in resonance.
Please review the life work of Dr. Hans Jenny (1904-1972) as evidence of how energy is transmitted. Observe the forms that symbolically emerge as the result of energy in resonance.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation.
Anonymous
Edited: 11.29.2013, 12.20.2014, 08.23.2015, 01.22.2017, 12.18.2017, 04.14.2020, 02.16.2021, 02.25.2023, 06.-5.2023, 01.06.2024, 08.15.2024, 11.22.2024, 12.14.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2007 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice) You are also invited to visit https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/, and https://sagariandesignnetwork.blogspot.com and https://www.pinterest.com
No comments:
Post a Comment