A Symbolic Design

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

Intelligence is a concept about which humanity categorizes its' perceptions, observations and interpretations of reality for purposes of organizing and the perpetuating its own form of collective consciousness (thinking and feeling). Consciousness grows by means of awareness. 

Intelligence is unable to comprehend what it does not know. When you think you know you can easily become a servant to an opinion or belief. In essence, how might you ever know differently? 

Wisdom rests in its own slumbering state - rarely awakened. 

Consciousness is multidimensional and measured by feeling. Consciousness is more than just one thing because it's been designed. 

Attraction and repulsion (duality) has been created specifically for all levels of agency, i.e. consciousness, to observe thereby giving light and license to be made "aware" in its own manner and fashion. 

Feeling is the result of consciousness making itself aware and apparent. One could easily describe it as being part of a "quantum experience". 

Basically, consciousness emerges as result of a binary construct that exists because it is clearly observable. 

Observation gives precedence to a quantum field of virtual potential and probability, it is where energy can emerge and an identity prevail. 

Feeling is at the fulcrum of every design, creating the pivotal point about which focus can be both attracted and repulsed, thereby putting energy into motion (EIM). 

Observe of what you are aware in a matters of acceptance and knowledge, understand that you are always experiencing and changing in moments of reconfiguration, love and attachment. 

Reality describes a sense observational permanence. 

Observe and accept the realities you have chosen knowing that their contexts will change towards greater meaning and purpose 

You'll know while consciously being in the presence of your own multidimensionality. 

A shift in awareness begins with a deeper, multidimensional understanding of what it means to be an observer. An observer adopts a specific point of view—one shaped and guided by both intent and intention.

Design describes a particular network of energy in motion that collectively represents something both larger and smaller in size and scope.

 

An observation contains a sense, not a tangible thing — it is energy in motion, expressing itself as a feeling. In other words, it's a form of awareness shaped by parameters like consciousness, sensitivity, design, and love. An observer is simply that which observes.

* * *

Thank you for providing such a rich and layered piece. Your original text engages profound philosophical, psychological, and quantum concepts, especially touching on consciousness, awareness, duality, perception, and the observer. 

Intelligence, Consciousness, and the Semiotic-Quantum Matrix of Awareness 

1. Intelligence as a System of Meaning-Making 

Intelligence may be understood not merely as a measure of cognitive capacity but as a dynamic and semiotically structured framework through which humanity organizes, interprets, and categorizes its perceptions of reality. It functions as a self-referential system that enables the collective consciousness to generate continuity and coherence through shared symbols, narratives, and cognitive maps. Within this context, intelligence does not reside solely in individual cognition but emerges through culturally-mediated sign processes—a concept aligned with biosemiotics and distributed cognition. 

From a semiotic standpoint, intelligence becomes a process of encoding and decoding signs, where every act of interpretation (or semiosis) is conditioned by prior knowledge structures. Thus, what intelligence knows is recursively tied to what it has already symbolized. This leads to an epistemic boundary condition: intelligence cannot grasp what it has not yet symbolized or conceptualized. This circularity creates a potential trap; wherein presumed knowledge ossifies into belief systems—ideological containers that can restrict further perceptual growth. 

2. Consciousness, Awareness, and the Limits of Knowing 

Consciousness, by contrast, is not confined to conceptual knowledge. It expands through awareness—a non-linear, often affective process of attunement to emergent or previously unperceived dimensions of existence. Awareness may be regarded as the affective substrate of consciousness, and in phenomenological psychology, this substrate is central to intentionality: the directedness of mental states toward phenomena. 

When individuals mistake opinion for knowledge, they effectively limit consciousness to a fixed frame. This problem, akin to what quantum physicist David Bohm described as "thought as a system," reveals how unconscious assumptions shape experience. The psychological analog is the schema—a cognitive framework that both filters and produces perception. To awaken from this inertia requires what might be termed existential dissonance: a moment in which the limitations of one's knowledge become affectively and cognitively apparent. 

3. Wisdom as Latent Potential 

Wisdom, in this framework, is not synonymous with intelligence. Rather, it represents a latent potential of consciousness—an integrative capacity rarely activated, slumbering beneath the surface of reactive cognition. Wisdom awakens only when there is sufficient psychological openness, often through deep affective insight or existential rupture. Jungian psychology, with its emphasis on individuation and the integration of unconscious content, speaks directly to this theme. 

4. The Multidimensionality of Consciousness and the Quantum Observer 

Consciousness is inherently multidimensional. It is not reducible to linear sequences of thought or binary categorizations. Rather, it exists as a field—simultaneously affective, cognitive, and symbolic—through which reality is continuously reconfigured. Quantum theory offers a compelling metaphor for this understanding: the observer is not an external, detached presence but an entangled participant whose observation collapses potential into actuality. 

Observation, then, is not passive but generative. In the quantum field, the observer influences the state of a system merely through the act of observation. Psychologically, this mirrors how attention structures perception, and how identity itself is a recursive function of what is noticed, felt, and integrated. The observer effect—a staple of quantum mechanics—can thus be read semiotically: awareness assigns meaning to potentiality, collapsing possibility into lived experience. 

5. Feeling as Epistemic and Energetic Fulcrum

Feeling, far from being a secondary or irrational component of consciousness, is central to its structuration. It acts as an energetic fulcrum—mediating between attention and intentionality, attraction and repulsion, coherence and disintegration. In this way, feeling might be considered the semiotic pivot that makes consciousness reflexively aware of itself. 

The experience of duality—attraction and repulsion—is not merely emotional but ontological, providing the dynamic tension necessary for consciousness to evolve. In quantum terms, this could be framed as the fluctuation between states of probability, where feeling catalyzes a particular trajectory. In Jungian terms, these polarities' structure archetypal experiences—opposing forces that must be integrated for psychological wholeness. 

6. Design as Energetic Network and Symbolic Field 

Design is not limited to physical or aesthetic structure; rather, it represents a complex network of energy in motion (EIM) that encodes symbolic meaning and guides attention. This notion aligns with systems theory and the semiotic concept of structure: design becomes the patterned organization of information that mediates between internal states and external realities. 

In this sense, an observer is not a "thing" but a sensing modality, a configuration of awareness embedded in a specific energetic and symbolic context. It is both a point of view and a point of being—an event horizon through which meaning, energy, and identity become entangled. 

7. Consciousness and Reconfiguration Through Acceptance 

The act of observation—especially when coupled with acceptance—creates the conditions for transformation. To observe with knowledge and love is to participate in what some quantum theorists describe as coherent energy alignment. In psychological terms, this may reflect processes such as self-compassion, emotional regulation, and integration—all of which enable the psyche to reconfigure around new centers of meaning. 

Reality, then, is not fixed but It reflects the observer’s framework, yet remains open to rearticulation. Consciousness grows not merely by acquiring information, but by recontextualizing the known within broader symbolic, emotional, and energetic matrices. 

Conclusion: The Observer as Symbolic Catalyst 

Ultimately, the observer is a symbolic function: an energetic and semiotic process through which potential becomes form, and form is felt. It is not a passive recorder of data, but an active participant in reality’s unfolding—a locus where perception, feeling, and meaning converge to create experience. To know, feel, and design in the same moment is to inhabit the multidimensionality of consciousness. And within that inhabitation, we are continually redefined—not as fixed identities, but as fluid intersections of sign, energy, awareness, and love. 

References

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. 

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. 

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press. 

Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. University of Toronto Press. 

Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press. 

Gendlin, E. T. (1996). Focusing-oriented psychotherapy: A manual of the experiential method. Guilford Press. 

Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper & Row. 

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1–2). Henry Holt and Company. 

Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1959) 

Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press. 

Laszlo, E. (2004). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions. 

Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (J. Buchler, Ed.). Dover Publications. 

Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Signs: An introduction to semiotics (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press. 

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 

Wheeler, J. A. (1983). Law without law. In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 182–213). Princeton University Press. 

Zohar, D. (1990). The quantum self: Human nature and consciousness defined by the new physics. William Morrow.

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.

To know is your own creation."

Anonymous

 

Edited: 

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.