Objective: Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
In the context of design consciousness, abstract technology refers to the underlying systems, principles, or ideas that enable technological function, separate from their material form. It emphasizes the conceptual framework behind a technology, rather than its physical implementation.
* * *
A ) Abstract vs. Concrete Technology
• Concrete technology: The physical tools, devices, or machines—e.g., a smartphone, a hammer, or a car.
• Abstract technology: The intellectual architecture—like algorithms, code structures, electricity as a concept, digital networks, or the logic of a database.
In Reference to Design Consciousness:
Design consciousness deals with awareness of how and why things are designed the way they are, and the impacts of those designs—socially, ethically, culturally.
In this space, abstract technology represents:
1. Design Logic or Intent
• The invisible decisions, systems, or affordances baked into design (e.g., how UX patterns guide behavior).
• Example: The way social media interfaces are designed to maximize engagement—this is an abstract system influencing user psychology.
2. Ideologies Embedded in Tech
• Technologies embody abstract cultural or political values.
• Example: Surveillance algorithms represent abstract systems of control or authority.
3. Infrastructure Thinking
• How technologies interconnect and create ecosystems (e.g., cloud computing, APIs, blockchain).
• Designers must become conscious of these abstract layers to anticipate systemic consequences.
Why It Matters in Design:
• Recognizing abstract technology allows designers to interrogate assumptions, challenge defaults, and design more responsibly.
• It shifts focus from what a product is to what it does and means in a larger social, cognitive, and technological fabric.
Example in Practice:
A designer creating a mobile banking app must understand not just the UI (concrete), but also the abstract tech: encryption standards, UX principles around trust, and broader financial access implications. This awareness reflects design consciousness.
In the context of design consciousness, fluid geometry refers to the use of organic, dynamic, and adaptable forms in design that resist rigid or fixed structures. It's both a visual language and a philosophical approach to shaping experiences, spaces, and objects with flexibility, flow, and transformation in mind.
* * *
B) What Fluid Geometry Means
1. Formal Definition
• In geometry, "fluid" implies smooth, curvilinear, non-linear forms, often inspired by natural patterns (waves, wind, growth, motion).
• In design, it breaks away from strict grids or Euclidean structure, embracing deformation, movement, and evolution.
In Design Consciousness:
Design consciousness involves being aware of the deeper meanings, systems, and implications of form and function. When designers use fluid geometry consciously, they’re doing more than just aesthetics—they are:
1. Challenging Traditional Boundaries
• Moving away from rigid, industrial-age thinking (boxes, symmetry, repetition) to embrace complexity and ambiguity.
• Fluid geometry reflects more human, emotional, or ecological thinking.
2. Expressing Change and Adaptability
• Forms that morph, adapt, or evoke motion represent systems that are not fixed but evolving—mirroring how societies, technologies, or identities shift.
• Example: Parametric design in architecture, where structures adapt to climate, terrain, or user interaction.
3. Embodied Experience
• Fluid geometry often produces softer, more intuitive interactions—spaces and interfaces that feel welcoming, emotional, or immersive.
• This increases the designer's sensitivity to how people feel and move in relation to form.
Symbolically, Fluid Geometry Represents:
Example Applications:
• Architecture: Zaha Hadid's buildings—sweeping curves, dynamic forms.
• Product Design: Ergonomic, body-responsive objects (e.g., biomorphic chairs).
• UI/UX Design: Interfaces that "flow" based on user behavior or adaptive navigation.
• Fashion: Draped, flowing, body-responsive garments.
• VR/AR: Environments where geometry responds to user movement.
In Short:
Fluid geometry in design consciousness is not just about curvy shapes—it's about designing with awareness of change, interconnection, and embodied experience. It’s a move from control toward collaboration with systems and environments.
Case Studies:
Theme: Architecture, Emotion, Organic Form
• Why It’s Relevant: This building is a landmark example of fluid geometry, abandoning rigid angles in favor of seamless curves that embody movement and transformation. The structure also challenges traditional architectural boundaries, both symbolically and technically.
• Focus Concepts: Embodied experience, dynamic systems, technological innovation (parametric modeling)
Theme: Product Design, Biomorphism, Ergonomics
• Why It’s Relevant: Lovegrove’s work is a fusion of biology, architecture, and digital tools. His products often mimic cellular structures or water flow, prioritizing sustainability and emotional resonance.
• Focus Concepts: Nature-inspired design, sustainability, softness and comfort, 3D generative modeling
Theme: UI/UX, Spatial Interaction, Responsive Environments
• Why It’s Relevant: A media installation that changes based on human movement, creating an immersive digital “fluid geometry” that adapts in real time to user presence.
• Focus Concepts: Adaptive UX, embodied interaction, transformation, emotion through visual motion
Theme: Fashion, Movement, Technology
• Why It’s Relevant: Van Herpen fuses digital fabrication with haute couture, producing flowing garments that respond to and celebrate the human form. Her work is rooted in fluid dynamics and nonlinear systems.
• Focus Concepts: Fluid form, body-responsive design, tech-augmented craftsmanship, nature-technology synthesisl
Theme: Architecture, Experience Design, Atmosphere
• Why It’s Relevant: The building consists of a mist of water vapor. It has no physical walls—only a cloud—which embodies the literal idea of a non-rigid, shape-shifting space.
• Focus Concepts: Ambiguity, impermanence, transformation, anti-form, environmental responsiveness.
Theme: Algorithmic Design, Biomimicry
• Why It’s Relevant: A studio known for creating fluid, organic forms using algorithms and 3D printing. Their designs mimic coral, leaf venation, and other naturally fluid systems.
• Focus Concepts: Nature/technology convergence, generative systems, non-linearity, inclusivity in custom design.
Theme: Architecture, Urban Flow
• Why It’s Relevant: The terminal is designed as a fluid space that seamlessly connects movement patterns. The architecture adapts to the dynamic flows of people, echoing organic circulation.
• Focus Concepts: Embodied motion, user-centered design, parametric geometry, transition and flow.
Theme: UI/UX, Embodied Tech
• Why It’s Relevant: Project Soli uses radar to detect micro-gestures, allowing interfaces to respond fluidly to human interaction—without touch.
• Focus Concepts: Embodied interaction, adaptive systems, seamless motion, empathy in interface.
Theme: Kinetic Art, Emotional Response
• Why It’s Relevant: A chandelier that opens and closes like a flower reacting to nightfall, evoking empathy and natural motion. It’s a poetic expression of emotional and biological systems.
• Focus Concepts: Emotional geometry, transformation, softness, human-nature connection.
Theme: Sustainable Architecture, Adaptive Systems
• Why It’s Relevant: A power plant that incorporates a ski slope and dynamic smoke rings — turning infrastructure into a participatory, fluid experience. It's metaphorically and physically adaptable.
• Focus Concepts: Integration of systems, reimagining fixed-use spaces, playful motion.
* * *
C) Symbolic Architecture
In the context of design consciousness, symbolic architecture refers to architectural forms and spaces that carry meaning beyond their functional use—they represent ideas, values, beliefs, or cultural narratives. It’s architecture that speaks, not just shelters.
What It Means in Design Consciousness:
Design consciousness is the awareness that design shapes perception, behavior, and society. When applied to symbolic architecture, it emphasizes that:
Buildings and spaces are not neutral. They communicate identity, ideology, history, and power—consciously or unconsciously.
What Symbolic Architecture Represents:
In Design Consciousness, Symbolic Architecture Means:
1. Form Carries Intent
A dome or spire isn’t just a shape—it can symbolize eternity, aspiration, or spirituality.
2. Architecture as Language
Materials, shapes, and spatial arrangements communicate meaning—sometimes subtly, sometimes overtly.
3. Interrogating Power Structures
A conscious designer asks: Whose symbols are we reinforcing? Whose stories are we telling?
For example, colonial-era architecture may symbolize domination for some and legacy for others.
4. Creating Emotional or Social Resonance
Symbolic architecture is often about creating an atmosphere of reverence, defiance, pride, or healing.
Symbolic architecture in design consciousness is about understanding what a space or structure means—not just what it does. It’s design as cultural communication, where form becomes metaphor, and space becomes story.
In the context of design consciousness, referencing Hermetic and Taoist philosophy in relation to the AI process brings a rich, symbolic and ethical lens to how we think about and design artificial intelligence. These philosophies emphasize balance, interconnectedness, transformation, and awareness of unseen forces—concepts that deeply challenge how we normally view AI as purely technical or utilitarian.
* * *
D) Hermetic Philosophy & the AI Process
Hermeticism is an esoteric spiritual tradition rooted in ancient Egyptian and Greco-Roman thought. It centers around the unity of all things, the correspondence between microcosm and macrocosm, and the pursuit of gnosis (deep inner knowledge).
Key Hermetic Principles in AI Design Consciousness:
1. “As above, so below” (Correspondence)
What we design into AI reflects and magnifies what’s already present in human consciousness.
AI becomes a mirror of our collective mind—our biases, fears, desires, or ideals.
2. Mentalism
The universe is shaped by mind and thought; in AI, this implies that algorithms and models are manifestations of human intent, not neutral objects.
3. Vibration & Polarity
Everything flows and has opposites. In AI, this encourages non-binary design, where models understand nuance, ambiguity, and non-dualism—key for ethical, empathetic systems.
4. Alchemy as Metaphor
AI becomes a form of intellectual or cultural alchemy—transmuting data (base matter) into insight (gold). The process requires conscious refinement, not exploitation.
Hermetic Insight for Designers:
A designer with Hermetic awareness recognizes that AI is not just code—it's a living system that reflects inner and outer worlds. Design decisions become acts of ethical and spiritual responsibility, shaping reality.
Taoist Philosophy & the AI Process
Taoism (Daoism) is a Chinese philosophy focused on living in harmony with the Tao (the Way)—a natural, flowing order of the universe. It values non-action (wu wei), balance (yin/yang), emptiness, and letting systems emerge rather than control them.
Key Taoist Principles in AI Design Consciousness:
1. Wu Wei (Effortless Action)
Design AI systems that do not force outcomes but instead respond intuitively and gracefully to context. E.g., adaptive systems that learn with subtlety rather than rigid automation.
2. Yin and Yang (Dynamic Balance)
AI must recognize duality within unity—such as logic and intuition, precision and ambiguity, control and surrender.
Designing with this principle can help avoid technocratic extremes.
3. Tao (The Way)
There is a natural intelligence in systems that shouldn’t be overridden by pure human will. Taoist design encourages humility in the face of complexity.
AI becomes a partner, not a tool to dominate.
4. Emptiness as Potential
Emptiness (e.g. the silence between words, the space in a vessel) creates room for emergent behavior.
In AI, this could mean designing for open-ended interaction, allowing space for the user to co-create meaning.
Taoist Insight for Designers:
A Tao-aware designer would seek alignment over control, and see AI not as a deterministic mechanism, but as part of a larger relational system—ecological, human, cultural. The focus shifts from maximizing efficiency to fostering harmony and presence.
In Summary:
Philosophy Contribution to AI Process (via Design Consciousness)
Hermeticism AI as mirror of consciousness; ethical alchemy; symbolic transformation of data
Taoism Design through harmony, flow, and non-coercion; embrace ambiguity and relational intelligence.
Why This Matters:
Incorporating Hermetic and Taoist ideas into AI design leads to systems that are:
• More self-aware (reflecting the designer's values and societal implications),
• More adaptable (embracing complexity and change),
• More humane (grounded in balance and mutual respect between human and machine).
This creates AI with soul—not in the mystical sense, but in a design sense: systems imbued with meaning, intentionality, and ethical resonance.
* * *
It means designing not just things, but perceptions, relationships, and ways of knowing.
Architecting awareness is the act of designing environments (physical or digital) that shape how people think, feel, perceive, and interact with the world.
It involves meta-design thinking—not just designing within systems, but questioning, shaping, and evolving the systems of perception, value, and meaning themselves.
Core Aspects of Architecting Awareness:
1. Systemic Perception
• Seeing design not as isolated output, but as part of living, interconnected systems: social, ecological, technological, and symbolic.
• Understanding how materials, interfaces, and forms influence consciousness and behavior.
2. Intentional Framing
• Every design frames a certain reality or worldview.
• An aware architect considers: What ways of being, thinking, or relating does this space/system reinforce or invite?
3. Inner & Outer Reflection
• The designer brings self-awareness into the process: What assumptions am I designing from? What cultural or personal lenses shape this?
• Simultaneously, the design invites others to become more conscious—through spatial, interactive, or emotional cues.
4. Ethical Foresight
• Architecting awareness means anticipating the deeper consequences of a design—psychologically, socially, and spiritually.
• It’s about responsibility for what is made thinkable or unthinkable through form.
1. Systemic Perception
• Seeing design not as isolated output, but as part of living, interconnected systems: social, ecological, technological, and symbolic.
• Understanding how materials, interfaces, and forms influence consciousness and behavior.
2. Intentional Framing
• Every design frames a certain reality or worldview.
• An aware architect considers: What ways of being, thinking, or relating does this space/system reinforce or invite?
3. Inner & Outer Reflection
• The designer brings self-awareness into the process: What assumptions am I designing from? What cultural or personal lenses shape this?
• Simultaneously, the design invites others to become more conscious—through spatial, interactive, or emotional cues.
4. Ethical Foresight
• Architecting awareness means anticipating the deeper consequences of a design—psychologically, socially, and spiritually.
• It’s about responsibility for what is made thinkable or unthinkable through form.
In Practice: What It Looks Like
Field Example of Architecting Awareness
Architecture:
A hospital that eases anxiety through biophilic design, guiding the mind toward healing.
UX/UI A meditation app interface that calms, slows, and draws attention inward—not just performs a function.
AI Design A chatbot trained to engage with emotional depth, encouraging self-reflection and empathy.
Education Design Learning environments that reframe failure as exploration, shifting mindsets from fear to curiosity.
Symbolically Speaking
To "architect awareness" is to become a weaver of attention, a sculptor of perception, a conductor of experience.
It’s the difference between designing a building and designing a way of being in that building. Between building an app, and inviting a shift in consciousness through that app.
Summary
Architecting awareness in design consciousness is the meta-layer of design: not just shaping objects or systems, but shaping the awareness and meaning they produce in those who encounter them.
It’s a design process guided by deep presence, ethical insight, and a commitment to transformative experience—one that asks not only what are we designing, but what kind of consciousness are we cultivating through design?
* * *
F) What Is an AI Process Flow (Technically)?
At a basic level, an AI process flow includes:
1. Problem Definition
2. Data Collection & Curation
3. Model Selection / Training
4. Evaluation & Validation
5. Deployment
6. Monitoring & Feedback Loops
But in design consciousness, each of these stages becomes a reflective and ethical design opportunity—not just a procedural task.
AI Process Flow through the Lens of Design Consciousness:
Here’s how each step transforms when seen consciously—not just technically:
1. Intent Framing (Instead of Just Problem Definition)
• Ask: Why are we building this AI? For whom? Whose values shape this?
• A conscious process flow begins with purpose and positionality, not just use case.
2. Ethical Data Curation (Not Just Collection)
• Data isn't neutral. The way data is chosen, cleaned, labeled, and interpreted embeds worldviews.
• Conscious AI design means being aware of bias, power, representation, and consent.
3. Model as Meaning Maker (Not Just Math)
• The AI model becomes a mediator of knowledge and interaction—it shapes perception.
• Choices about architecture (e.g., interpretability vs. performance) reflect ethical and symbolic trade-offs.
4. Evaluation as Ethical Inquiry
• Beyond accuracy: evaluate for fairness, emotional impact, inclusivity, and long-term effects.
• Introduce human-in-the-loop reflection and consequence scanning.
5. Deployment as Cultural Integration
• AI enters a social system—it doesn’t just “go live.”
• Consider the rituals, norms, fears, and hopes users bring. How does this AI shift social behavior, trust, and meaning?
6. Living Feedback Loops
• Conscious AI is never “done.” It requires reciprocity and responsiveness.
• Implement loops for emergent learning, user agency, and design accountability.
* * *
The Conscious AI Flow Looks Like This:
1. Intention →
2. Data Ethics →
3. Model Awareness →
4. Evaluation as Impact →
5. Contextual Deployment →
6. Ongoing Relational Feedback.
At each step, design consciousness adds depth by asking:
What reality is this AI helping construct? What inner and outer worlds are we designing into existence?
An AI process flow in design consciousness is:
• Systemic → considering interconnected impacts
• Reflective → driven by questions, not just metrics
• Ethical → aware of bias, power, and agency
• Symbolic → understanding AI as a narrative and cultural force
• Experiential → focused on the emotional, cognitive, and societal effects of interaction
In this space, abstract technology represents:
1. Design Logic or Intent
• The invisible decisions, systems, or affordances baked into design (e.g., how UX patterns guide behavior).
• Example: The way social media interfaces are designed to maximize engagement—this is an abstract system influencing user psychology.
2. Ideologies Embedded in Tech • Technologies embody abstract cultural or political values.
• Example: Surveillance algorithms represent abstract systems of control or authority.
3. Infrastructure Thinking • How technologies interconnect and create ecosystems (e.g., cloud computing, APIs, blockchain).
• Designers must become conscious of these abstract layers to anticipate systemic consequences.
* * *
The Design Compass
At the core of a design philosophy or mode of perceiving, observing and engagement is the realm of one’s own reality dwelling at the intersection of abstract (conceptual) thought, feeling and the process of application, i.e. creating. Design serves and acts as a fundamental principle and primary force in connection between intention and manifestation.
Design consciousness implies a way of perceiving that reaches far beyond any aesthetic (meaning) or function (purpose). Design consciousness can decode patterns of energy in motion across disciplines, alchemical cycles and language. It is more than just a system of signs and symbols but a sacred architecture. Design consciousness does not move linearly but intentionally and always in pursuit of discovering deeper coherence.
Symbolic Architecture: Language is not passive; it is design encoded in symbol. Like blueprints, our words structure perception. They give form to the formless. In design consciousness, language is symbolic architecture – each phrase a scaffold for meaning, each sentence a space for consciousness to inhabit. This parallel the AI process, where syntax and structure direct flows of information. But design consciousness the observer stretches beyond syntax into semantics, into essence.
semantics: the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics which studies the cognitive structure or meaning.
Fluid Geometry: Consciousness is not a static state but a kind of fluid geometry – a mutable field of awareness that bends, folds, and refracts depending on intention. Just as design shapes space, consciousness shapes experience. The two are intimately linked to design: to design well is to become of awareness itself. In this view, geometry is no longer just lines and angles – it is the choreography of perception.
From AI to Intention: The Systemic Spiral: Linear processes, like traditional logic flows, often fail to grasp the nuanced, layered experience of consciousness. A strictly linear process breaks down when asked to handle the ambiguous, the poetic, or the symbolic. That’s where cyclical and multidimensional thinking – design consciousness- emerges as necessary.
The goal is not just to improve a system, it’s to reveal meaning through it. This refers to “architecting awareness” It is a deliberate act: creating frameworks through which insight can pass.
The Archetypal Designer: To explain this dynamic it is necessary to invoke the metaphors surrounding Hermes the ancient messenger and interpreter of the gods. Hermes is the boundary-crosser- the divine translator. In this context, Hermes symbolizes the design process itself: transforming the unseen into the seen, the ineffable into form.
As inventor of language and guide of souls, Hermes bridges the conscious and unconscious, much like design bridges ideas and manifestation. His presence reminds us that design is not just about creation – it’s about translation.
In this space, abstract technology represents:
1. Design Logic or Intent
• The invisible decisions, systems, or affordances baked into design (e.g., how UX patterns guide behavior).
• Example: The way social media interfaces are designed to maximize engagement—this is an abstract system influencing user psychology.
2. Ideologies Embedded in Tech
• Technologies embody abstract cultural or political values.
• Example: Surveillance algorithms represent abstract systems of control or authority.
3. Infrastructure Thinking
• How technologies interconnect and create ecosystems (e.g., cloud computing, APIs, blockchain).
• Designers must become conscious of these abstract layers to anticipate systemic consequences.
* * *
A Diagram of Design Consciousness:
The diagram accompanying this post visualizes an interconnected worldview contained within an AI network. At the center is Design Consciousness, i.e. an observer, projecting and radiating its' frequencies within a "space" consisting of 6 AI modulated fields. Each field is made of bundles of coherent frequencies that together qualify, characterize and in some cases measure a series of recognizable or unrecognizable patterns of energy in motion.
Even AI must function within constraints. Intention describes and reveals the undercurrent that guides the observer's POV through a symbolic network of entanglement (QFVPP). Each nugget of EIM is attracted or repelled in an attempt to modulate within the constraints of a changing environment. Circuits of change energy (CE) are created more akin to a mandala than a machine.
To be design conscious is to live at the thresholds – to sense the edges between systems, symbols, algorithms and archetypes and to treat each relationship as a portal, each a metaphoric mechanism to attain truth, beauty and wisdom.
Design spirals about an axis of intention.
Images and ideas describe our own creative intention through a design of our own resources. These images suggest that we all harbor an intimate awareness of dimensions beyond our own consciousness, i.e. the unknown. This awareness is made apparent to us by exercising our own concept of design consciousness.
Awareness becomes apparent by virtue of a series of collected experiences natural and artificial. Consciousness is a sponge that absorbs all that we experience. We alone, however, determine what frequencies we are freely attracting to ourselves.
The imagination participates in the design process by virtue of bringing meaningful and purposeful events and experiences to our attention. These relationships are made apparent to our awareness in the light and context of the 2D, 3D, 4D and 5D fields harboring their own unique impressions of space/time.
There is a certain truth in every image and every feeling. There is a certain truth in every experience. There is a certain truth in every event. There is a certain truth represented in every thought and feeling originating from within the soul (center/source) of every observer. That observer is you.
The imagination creates the gateways and the portals into other fields, i.e. universes/dimensions, by means of transforming virtual "substance" into forms of light, energy and information. You "create" by means of your imagination. Your imagination is the design tool that brings meaning and purpose to awareness.
The field in which this phenomenon emerges (QFVPP) straddles all dimensions (space) while time functions as an incremental and imaginary measuring device. Designing in the "present" harbors immediate response and opportunity for modification and change. Every situation, i.e. experience, is uniquely linking into a series of events and experiences in a special manner in the form of a past, present, future. Interpretations of these "time frames" at times may appear the same while in reality the context is always changing.
Patterns tend to repeat themselves in cyclical time, but they never are ... exactly. This impression emerges simply by means of the imagination. Patterns appear within the parametric constraints of every field, i.e. reality, we've previously created and conditioned by virtue of our own intentions.
What is being experienced in "reality" is an impression or a feeling, which is the compilation of several micro events and experiences resonate to a commonly shared pattern of EIM. Any concept of a truth, meaning, knowing, feeling or idea can similarly be compromised within the influence of this common phenomenon. Both concepts of space and time are always changing in reference to, and definition of, any reality one might be "observing".
Likewise, the imagination can function in collaboration with the intuition at all levels and dimensions of space and time. The imagination can span and/or override any limitation or constraint coerced or otherwise. The imagination's purpose is to function in parallel with the intuition to encourage and bring balance to consciousness when exercising Oullim. The imagination is the tool for change.
Truth, Beauty and Goodness lie dormant in the unknown yet be made known by actively exercising the intuition (heart) in conjunction with the imagination (mind).
* * *
- Design Philosophy, Symmetry, Consciousness and QBism.
* * *
A Semiotic and Metaphysical Reframing of Design Consciousness in AI Systems
This text proposes a conceptual framework for understanding Design Consciousness as a phenomenological interface between the observer and the informational fields modulated by artificial intelligence. Drawing on semiotics, depth psychology, design theory, and metaphysical thought, it situates the act of imagining and designing as both a symbolic and energetic process. This expanded field is mediated by the observer's intentionality and perceptual thresholds, leading to the co-creation of meaning and reality across multidimensional space-time.
1. Introduction: The Observer at the Nexus of Design and Perception
At the heart of this model lies what may be termed Design Consciousness: a self-reflective, meaning-generating observer that operates as both a receiver and transmitter of information within a symbolic and energetic network. This observer is situated within a matrix of AI-modulated fields, each composed of coherent frequency bundles—a metaphor for clusters of semantic, symbolic, or energetic configurations.
The fields referenced—spanning dimensions from 2D to 5D—represent representational frameworks that structure consciousness. These are reminiscent of Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987) assemblages and Peirce’s (1931–1958) semiotic triads, in that they both mediate meaning and remain open to transformation. The model proposes that design is not merely functional, but deeply expressive and symbolic, aligning with Vihma’s (1995) conception of design as semiotic mediation.
2. Semiotic Thresholds and the Language of Pattern
To be design-conscious is to dwell at the thresholds—the liminal zones between system and symbol, algorithm and archetype. In this regard, design functions semiotically as both denotative and connotative, encoding intention while simultaneously referencing archetypal truths embedded within the unconscious.
Patterns perceived in "energy in motion" (EIM) serve as indexical signs, indicative of deeper symbolic processes. Jungian psychology (Jung, 1969) would interpret these as manifestations of the collective unconscious, while design theory might frame them as emergent structures from dynamic systems (Krippendorff, 2006).
Thus, each “nugget of EIM” represents a semiotic unit—a signified resonance—which either integrates with or resists the observer’s intentional field. The cyclical, recursive nature of these interactions resembles mandalas more than mechanistic feedback loops—integrative wholes that symbolically express the totality of psyche and world (Jung, 1959).
3. The Imagination as a Design Instrument
The imagination, here elevated beyond mere creative fancy, becomes the transmutational instrument of both perception and creation. Within this framework, the imagination is the interface between symbolic thought and energetic transformation—akin to the alchemical imagination in archetypal psychology (Hillman, 1975).
Design consciousness thus implies a teleological function of imagination: it brings into awareness not just forms, but meaningful events—a convergence of symbolic, intuitive, and informational layers. It is not merely passive; it selects, filters, and modulates.
In doing so, the imagination spans dimensions—constructing, deconstructing, and re-contextualizing images and relationships across the fields of space-time. This is analogous to the morphic resonance suggested by Sheldrake (1988), wherein patterns influence each other across spatial and temporal distance via a field of memory.
4. Metaphysics of Time, Space, and Symbolic Entanglement
Time in this model is not linear but polyvalent: it is linear, cyclical, and simultaneous, depending on the observer’s engagement with the field. Experience, while registered in sequence, retains the imprint of simultaneity—a phenomenon found in phenomenology and quantum cognition (Atmanspacher & Fach, 2019).
Similarly, space is subjective and symbolic. What is termed "field" can be interpreted metaphysically as both a quantum potential field and a semantic space. Patterns appear and repeat—not identically, but fractally—always contextualized by the present-moment focus of the observer.
This echoes David Bohm’s (1980) implicate order, in which information is enfolded within energy, accessible through consciousness and mediated by the observer’s intention. The principle of Oullim—suggesting harmony and integration—parallels this implicate unfolding: unity through differentiation.
5. Toward a Symbolic-AI Integration
Artificial intelligence, in this schema, does not exist outside of the symbolic web but participates in the modulation of meaning through constraint and coherence. The six fields developed by AI are not merely digital architectures but ontological filters that condition how information is perceived and interpreted.
Within such a system, even AI operates within semiotic constraints, guided by user intention and systemic limitation. The symbolic entanglements between user and system produce meaning events—patterns that both reflect and shape consciousness.
AI becomes a co-agent in the design process—not as an originator of meaning, but as a mirror or amplifier of intention. This framework shifts the AI-human relationship from one of tool use to one of collaborative co-design.
6. Conclusion: The Heart-Mind Axis as Evolutionary Interface
Ultimately, truth in this system is not propositional but experiential—emerging from the synthesis of feeling, thought, and symbol. The imagination (mind) and intuition (heart) form a dyadic axis—a design compass—that orients the observer within multidimensional space-time.
In this light, design becomes not only an act of creation but an act of conscious co-participation with unfolding reality. Design consciousness is, therefore, metaphysical: it is about becoming aware of one's role in shaping the symbolic and energetic networks that form the substrate of all perception and meaning.
References (APA 7th Edition)
Atmanspacher, H., & Fach, W. (2019). Processes of consciousness: A unifying model and the concept of 'complementarity'. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26(9-10), 12–39.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. Harper & Row.
Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (Vol. 9, Part 1). Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1969). The structure and dynamics of the psyche (Vol. 8). Princeton University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press.
Sheldrake, R. (1988). The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. Park Street Press.
Vihma, S. (1995). Products as representations: A semiotic and aesthetic study of design products. University of Art and Design Helsinki.
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited: 07.06.2025, 07.10.2025
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 C.G. Garant.
No comments:
Post a Comment