Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.
Metaphysically speaking, not all emotions are fully measurable, and the reasons are structural rather than merely technical. The limitation arises from the nature of emotions themselves, not from deficiencies in instruments or methods.
What might “measurable” mean? Measurement presupposes at three conditions.
1. The phenomenon must hold a repeatable structure. It must be stable.
1. The phenomenon must hold a repeatable structure. It must be stable.
2. It must be distinguishable from its context in other words, it must have observable boundaries and,
3. It must be comparable across all observers, they must share the same reference frame.
Typically an emotion will often violate one or more of these conditions. Metaphysically, emotions are not objects; they are transitional events in energy-in-motion that pass through multiple ontological layers before they stabilize … if they ever do.
Some emotions can be measured if they collapse into measurable signatures because they strongly couple to physical and symbolic systems. These include hormonal release patterns (e.g. cortisol, oxytocin), neural activation regularities, automatic responses (heart rate variability), behavioral consistency across populations and linguistic codification and cultural stability. These all have high coherence and low ambiguity at the biological-symbolic interface, ex. fear, anger, basic pleasures/displeasures and stress. When stability is in a downstream mode and not the emotion in its original form.
Abstract Human Emotions ChatGPT 5.2
Emotions often exist prior to form and therefore are not fully measurable. Many emotions arise as pre-symbolic, pre-linguistic fields: Intuitively uneasy, subliminal longing, creative anticipation, sacred awe, existential melancholy, LOVE in its generative form. At this stage, emotion exists as a vector tendency, not a discrete state because there is no fixed boundary to measure … only directionality.
In reference to a field-based metaphysics, emotions are multi-field phenomena. At quantum levels emotions takes on the impression of a probability gradient, plasmic field as an energetic charge and/or intensity, fractally as a recursive pattern over time and holographically as a particular coherence reflecting upon a certain meaning or identity. Measurement typically operates one field at a time; an emotion that spans all four fields cannot be fully captured without collapse or reduction.
Observation changes in reference to emotion. Emotion is based upon an observer and his/her corresponding participation in a certain situation or circumstance. To actually measure an emotion, the subject must first reflect upon it, symbolically stabilize it which in turn alters its original state. Measurement thus converts an energy-in-motion, i.e. e-motion, first as experience then into an emotion-as-representation (sign, symbol, metaphor or analogy). Therefore, what is actually being measured is a post-transformational artifact.
Emotions do not have fixed ontological locations. An emotion may exist between two or more people, across time, as a relational tension, a cultural resonance or as an unexpressed potential. Phenomena are distributed and not localized objects. Measurement in these cases presumes there is a locality.
The attempt to fully measure all emotions commits a metaphysical error. When dealt categorically emotions are treated as “states” of energy in motion when they are actually processes. Emotions are often treated as quantities, when many are qualitative transitions. Emotions are also treated as outputs when many just describe a generative condition.
* * *
WHAT CAN BE MEASURED AND WHAT CANNOT?
YES
MEASURABLE? WHY?
Physiological correlates stable physical signatures
Behavioral expressions repeatable patterns
PARTIALLY
Reported feelings language filters the experience
APPROXIMATELY
Emotional intensity scalar but context-dependent
NO
Emotional meaning contextual and symbolic
Emotional emergence pre-form and observer dependent
Emotional potential exists as a probability
Transformational love field-generative, not reactive
CONCLUSION
Emotions are not fully measurable because they are events and not objects. They often exist before form, they span multiple ontological fields, measurement collapses what it observes and that essentially, emotion lies in relation and not location. Measurement can track what emotions do, but not what emotions are at their origin. In design consciousness terms, emotion is the vector field that precedes structure. Measurement can only begin after structure appears.
Emotions restore coherence when they are allowed to complete their gating specific function without being collapsed into premature meaning or action (ref: Emotional Operating Protocol (EOP) for Design/Awareness/Consciousness (DAC) 14 gate architecture)
References (APA 7th Edition)
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Establishes that emotions are constructed, context-dependent processes rather than fixed biological modules.
Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709 Demonstrates limits of emotional measurability and the gap between physiology and subjective experience.
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace. Grounds emotions in bodily states while explicitly rejecting full reduction to measurable variables.
Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon Books. Supports the claim that emotions are transitional processes that become measurable only after partial stabilization.
Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins. Provides phenomenological evidence that reflective observation alters lived emotional experience.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787 Supports field-based and probabilistic models of affect that resist discrete measurement.
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205. Classic argument that emotions are processes, not entities, anticipating modern critiques of emotional objectification.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945) Foundational text for understanding emotion as embodied, relational, and non-localizable.
Pessoa, L. (2017). The cognitive-emotional brain: From interactions to integration. MIT Press. Demonstrates that emotions are distributed, network-level phenomena rather than isolatable states.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. Key support for the claim that emotions emerge from participatory, multi-level systems and cannot be fully captured by third-person measurement alone.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. Free Press. Metaphysical foundation for treating emotions as events in process rather than measurable substances.
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. MIT Press. Clarifies why subjective emotional experience resists total objectification without distortion.
The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
* * *
Edited:
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post on a non-commercial basis, the author and URL to be included. Please note … posts are continually being edited. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2026 C.G. Garant.
No comments:
Post a Comment